标题: Times Q Friends "Immediately flower" [打印本页] 作者: NHTsvj41656 时间: 2014-11-7 15:55 标题: Times Q Friends "Immediately flower" ■ monthly income of 2,500 yuan claiming her husband,http://store.neoluxuk.com, unwilling students "poor three generations", the poster is called "too poor woman" ■ More than 300 Times Q Friends participate in the discussions, more than 7 percent do not support this view
"I do not want to give her husband a monthly salary of 2500 yuan of poor children,http://www.prco.jp/~shake/apeboard/apeboard_plus.cgi?command=viewres&target=166360/,outlet woolrich cadriano, I'm wrong?" More than 10 days since a hung on the horizon forum posts sparked heated debate. As of yesterday,negozi woolrich firenze, 16 o'clock,hogan outlet,http://ebookspratiques.com/search.cgi, traffic reached 155,087 times,woolrich outlet cadriano, there are 2212 users replies. Reporter survey found that more than 300 participating in the discussion Times Q Friends in more than 7 percent do not agree with the woman's point of view.
"Too poor women": too poor husband refused to have children
Posted by network called "afterlife do not marry poor men," she claimed and was originally a college classmate of her husband married more than three years, "My husband's parents looking forward to grandchildren,giubbino woolrich, all day to put pressure on us,http://igohouse.jp/bbs/noti.cgi, but I do not want to have children, do not want to go in October to create a pregnancy 'poor three generations'. "
"Too poor woman" gives several reasons. She and her husband have very little income, you can not give a child a good growth environment,sito ufficiale moncler piumini, the child born destined inferior. "My husband monthly salary of 2,moncler torino outlet,500 yuan, job insecurity,woolrich travel jacket, we need to do nearly 20 years of house slaves." Secondly,http://ensembleada.com/publicity_next12/sunbbs.cgi?mode=form&no=226&page=2, she said that there is not much confidence in the future, within the foreseeable future, life is estimated that there is not much difference. "My husband said, so he earns enough to feed his wife and children when the children talk about things, but I knew that it is basically impossible to achieve." In addition, "too poor woman," said she has no mother energy, and now the first task is to survive.
Provoke controversy: Most people refute "too poor woman"
The 12th began, the reporter in Shun Net forum sponsored survey, more than 300 Times Q Friends participate in the discussion. Among them, more than 70% of respondents did not agree that "too poor female" point of view.
Opposition
Times Q Friends "Hero Mowen source": students do not have children, irrespective of rich and poor. Many people poor and white, do not they struggle through their own success.
Times Q Friends "I kind": Now the poor, does not mean a lifetime of poverty, the money can be earned slowly. Children may have a time limit,woolrich offerte, a few years,scarpe online hogan, you have probably advanced maternal age,woolrich torino, and then more children will have security implications.
Times Q "Friends of the dark,": I told the woman about the situation post. Because life stress, pregnancy was considered the child destroyed, but now my thoughts have changed --- I was poor, but I will try. I should be and her husband through thick and thin, rather than doing a Xianpinaifu Jiao Xiaojie. Agreed to send
Times Q Friends "Immediately flower": raising children is the responsibility of a lifetime, if no corresponding economic capability, do not just manufacture responsibility.
Times Q Friends "narration":
Raising children is a private matter, whether or not the child should see their own decisions.
Centrist
Times Q Friends "Misato Lake": Everyone look at the problem from different angles, we can not say who is wrong, only more rational side behold, a man can come to discuss. In addition, said the child would become "poor three generations", this prophecy too outrageous.
Professor of Sociology: rich and poor can not be used as a standard
Yesterday,http://bizguide.businessownersideacafe.com/cgi-bin/glinks/search.cgi, a sociology professor Lin Xue said in an interview: "What is happiness do is to have enough money, there are luxury cars, of course, the relationship between happiness and great substance, but the substance is not happy all content regardless of rich or poor,hogan donna outlet,??. Foster children will bring us happiness hard to replace. "
He said the issue of whether to have children, each family has its own criteria.
In his view, this standard is comprehensive, including the health of both spouses,http://www.railroadpix.com/cgi-bin/photos/search.cgi, the value of identity,[url=http://cutyayu.sakura.ne.jp/cabbs/sunbbs.cgi?mode=form&no=113&page=http://cutyayu.sakura.ne.jp/cabbs/sunbbs.cgi?mode=form&no=113&page=[/url], economic status, and family and career planning, etc., but never able to rich and poor as the sole criterion for whether to have children.
(Reporter Sun Hua)