标题: barbour pas cher make provision for [打印本页] 作者: jghm61h5hxn 时间: 2015-1-24 16:59 标题: barbour pas cher make provision for Wang Xi has long been concerned to modify environmental law, served as "Environmental Law Revision of" Task Force Shanghai Jiaotong University environmental law research director. The Joint Task Force has domestic environmental law colleges and eight universities Pace University, USA launched the "Environmental Law" research, and submitted "environmental law," the ministry after the implementation of the draft assessment report and the "Environmental Law" (revised results of the proposed draft) Bill and the like.Existing "environmental law" since the 1979 trial,barbour pas cher, has been formally implemented in 1989, 20 years has not been modified. August 2012 meeting of the twenty-eighth meeting of the Eleventh National People's Congress,abercrombie, the draft amendment to the Environmental Protection Act for the first consideration. August 31, 2012, the draft released to the public for comments.The main public interest environmental litigation limit for a rare"21st Century": "The draft amendment" provides "environmental pollution, ecological damage, harm public interests behavior, China Environment Federation and the Environment Federation in provinces,abercrombie roma, autonomous regions and municipalities can set up a people's court proceedings. "how do you see?Wang Xi: environmental public interest litigation,hollister pas cher, the provisions of the 2012 "Civil Procedure" amendment, environmental pollution,parajumpers homme, harm the public interest against the behavior of a number of legitimate rights and interests of consumers,hollister italia, institutions and organizations concerned the law may bring to the people's court litigation. This is one of the provisions of the "concerned" a wide range.In this regard, deputy director of the Legislative Affairs Commission of the NPC Standing Committee Wang Shengming said the final draft will be voted "relevant social groups" to "concerned", in fact, is the main scope of the public interest litigation filed further expanded."The draft amendment" can be written into the environmental public interest litigation.
" the legal responsibility to make provision, by the right to approve the project environmental impact assessment documents the administrative department of environmental protection order to stop the construction deadline for completing formalities; overdue formalities shall be liable to a fine of 50,hollister felpe,000 yuan and 200,000 yuan,air max pas cher pour homme, executives and other persons directly responsible for the construction of the unit directly responsible shall be given administrative sanctions.Compare, you can see that "the draft amendments" than the provision made great progress. First, it blocked before "deadline for completing" this "loophole." Under the previous rules,Giuseppe Zanotti Pas Cher, it is possible for a lot of deadline for completing projects launched violations opened a hole. Not approved before construction does not matter,tiffany gioielli, you can make up a procedure. This hole is very bad, long overdue stuffed. Second, it is proposed more stringent measures,abercrombie et fitch, which may require the construction unit restitution. Restitution in the end how to explain this? Does that mean some of the formalities of the construction project.
consider increasing the unallocated first built concrete construction unit responsible person liability, only to specific people assume strict liability, it may No reduction in the case of the first batch of construction.
which is a step forward. But will limit environmental public interest litigation as a social organization, was more dead restrict this practice is relatively rare practice in legislation, which is a form of discrimination against other social groups. I do not agree with this approach."21st Century": it has been that "the draft amendments" a big step forward is the environmental protection system, has long called for "daily meter penalty" written into it.Wang Xi: "daily meter penalty," the law is a step forward. It is mainly targeted at the more common illegal sewage and other environmental phenomena sustained by continued increases penalties for companies deterrent. But we can not be too optimistic about the system. Because of the outstanding problems in environmental law enforcement is not the fine standard is too low, but rather whether the trade protectionism and overcome local protectionism, so strict enforcement of the fair. This is the biggest problem of environmental law enforcement is how to deal with the balance between environmental protection and economic and social development.In terms of legal responsibility,air max one, and I suggested that the phenomenon of illegal sewage, not only to punish the unit,tn pas chere, but also to punish its responsible.Not approved the first building should be held responsible for specific"21st Century": "The draft amendment" to keep full controversial "not approved the first building" problem, make provision for: construction unit did not submit construction project environmental impact assessment law, unauthorized construction by the administrative department of environmental protection shall order stop construction,abercrombie, fined, and can be ordered restitution. How do you evaluate this provision?Wang Xi: "EIA Law" Article 31 has been on the "not approved the first building.
at the time of the audit found that the project should not be on,jordan pas cher, then you can request to stop the project, and to eliminate or start preparatory impact on the environment? If you can understand this,air max pas cher pour femme, then this one is very good,abercrombie pas cher, very powerful.Legal liability for not approved the first building, many people called for increasing the maximum fine should be, because the fines are too low before, the construction unit does not have sufficient deterrent. I think, of course, can play a role in doing so. The key issue is that the maximum fine can not be unlimited increase,air max pas cher femme, many large construction projects unit, do not care about fines. Increase certain maximum fine of not approved before construction curb may not really work.I suggest that the problem is not to build the first batch, if caused serious environmental consequences.
相关的主题文章：