标题: zanotti pas cher tSZC9O4WU2kEH1bcVp [打印本页] 作者: q498qqers4 时间: 2015-4-26 00:19 标题: zanotti pas cher tSZC9O4WU2kEH1bcVp including liability for "anti-monopoly" on, which is the first legislative intent of this law is the same strain . Therefore,tn pas cher, any business,hogan scarpe, including state-owned enterprises, the central level,tn requin, there is no "anti-monopoly law" applicable limits. Future antitrust punishment should be considered double punishment "21st Century": With the increase in anti-monopoly cases,felpe hollister, on the "anti-monopoly law" applies more and more. "Antitrust Law" obvious deficiencies which still exist and need to be revised in the future? Zhangchen Ying: "anti-monopoly law" requirement is a matter of principle, in broad terms,abercrombie et fitch, in particular the implementation of the process, need to be supplemented multiple departmental regulations, guidelines,sweat abercrombie, and the Supreme Court issued a judicial interpretation. In the regulation of administrative monopoly, the process management of public affairs organization abuse of administrative power to eliminate or restrict competition has the "anti-monopoly law,scarpe hogan," Article 51 provides that laws and administrative regulations for the executive and the laws and regulations authorized otherwise specified in accordance with its provisions. So, if such organizations have a monopoly situation, otherwise from its provisions,nike tn pas cher, no "anti-monopoly law" to regulate; no regulations,abercrombie et fitch, antitrust enforcement agencies have been given only "make suggestions" rather than "enforcement authority" probably not temporary,zanotti pas cher, but not a cure. Administrative monopoly as a market economy ills, its economic order free from the interference of the "economic constitution,boutique abercrombie france," but this does not help improve the market order, regulate the behavior of operators. In terms of legal responsibility, first of all,louboutin prix, the calculation of "confiscation of illegal income" is a problem. China's "anti-monopoly" on page 46 and 47 stipulates that the operators in violation of this provision.
reach and implement monopoly agreements (Article 47 of the abuse of market dominance),hogan interactive donna, and ordered by the antitrust enforcement agencies to stop illegal acts, confiscate the illegal income,affaire pas cher, and impose a fine of annual sales of more than ten percent of one percent or less; not implemented monopoly agreement reached shall be liable to a fine of 500,000 yuan. According to the principles of civil law, confiscate the illegal income is filled, that is not because of illegal profit; after penalties based on illegality, namely fined under the circumstances. In practice, this amount is difficult to calculate,affaire pas cher, so we see announcement,hogan, there is no calculation of illegal gains. However,scarpe hogan uomo, the above statute are the "confiscation of illegal income provision" clearly as a direct consequence of the violation of "antitrust laws", and "impose" the word is also clearly characterize the "confiscation of illegal income" and "fine" shall be applicable between the two is not optional "or" relationship. If only fined, but not confiscate the illegal income, not only missing content penalties in the literal sense, but also because of failure to follow the "first fill.
then punishment" path, contrary to the "anti-monopoly law," the legislative intent so required. Should consider amending the relevant sections. In the main responsibility, the responsibility of species,boutique abercrombie france, according to current law, the responsibility of the body not covered by corporate decision-makers, the main perpetrators, the person in charge of industry associations and direct the person in charge, lack of relevant decision-makers of the deterrent effect. Double punishment should consider requiring that the operator (in most cases is a corporate) and the main responsible body corporate shall constitute an offense. Because although the monopoly on legal subjects from the vast majority of cases that are implemented by business operators.
but the actual decision-making and implementation, and eventually executives directly responsible for these individuals.
相关的主题文章：