published in 2007

bbuusdit2t

Following the questioning Fang "plagiarizing chart, English translation error," the evening of February 7, Shenzhen University, Associate Professor Sun Haifeng then throw a "secret weapon" --- Michigan State University Students of Science professor RobertRoot-Bernstein interview video, questioned Fang plagiarism. In the material he provided, Robert according to the relevant parties alleged plagiarism translation convinced. But so far as of press time,nike air jordan soldes, Fang and Robert were not respond to the matter.
It is reported that Fang has long been questioned plagiarized his alma mater,air max homme pas cher, Professor RobertRoot-Bernstein's articles. Last year "rule of law over the weekend" had coverage. Robert himself had to negotiate with Fang via email.
Fang plagiarism case fry a year
February 7 this year, another netizen posted on Weibo Robert gave his reply, said, "I accused him (Fang) the copy of my argument,http://www.pscbots.com, arguments, and text, not only stole my articles, but also a violation of publishing This article is copyright of Oxford University Press. "
Day, Fang micro-Bo said, did not want to ignore, but there are several media have come to ask you to do a video by Tudou clarification.
Video, Fang explained (so-called plagiarism) is in 1995, he studied in the United States, arguing with people on the network, Robert used to write an essay in scientific definition. "In fact, this is not a four-point summarized his own unique perspective, but the consensus of the scientific community, but did not specify the source of the text where I quoted in the net,http://zbiboq.com/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=302280&fromuid=1135, is the consensus of the scientific community."
In 1999, he put some of the net posts when integrated into the anthology "Ark-line", added the source, saying it was based on an American scholar Root-Bernstein summarized.
Fang said that in 2010, Michigan State University school to do a survey, the conclusion is that there is no conclusive evidence to support the whistleblower their views. Its articles are published online,chaussures nike tn, with no relationship studies,sito ufficiale moncler, decided to not accept the charges.
Associate Professor and then throw deep questioning "bomb"
Sun Haifeng said: "this storm, the public can see Robert's always just e-mail reply we have retained a secret weapon, it is his video conversation on the matter.." Allegedly, around August last year, he and domestic Some people began to gather evidence academic plagiarism Fang,scarpe hogan prezzi, Fang and plans to assist in the prosecution. They commissioned Robert media people interviewed and recorded video, "It was thought that if he could not appear in court, to put this broadcast."
Last night, he gave Southern Reporter provides two (of three and a half minutes) video excerpts and English transcript of the video (allegedly video transcript). According to the transcript, said Professor Robert, initially to Liu real (Chinese-American scientist, also questioned Fang plagiarism) letter of Fang whether plagiarism of their works "Without the ability to make a judgment." Later, he continues to receive two or three other articles of personal translations are similar to its original. There is a "close friend of Dr. Fang Fang did not used to prove plagiarism, but all I see is plagiarism asked" to make sure this was a case of plagiarism.
Sun Haifeng said they consultations please RobertRoot-Bernstein China. If able to make the trip, he may be responsible for their travel in Shenzhen and Hong Kong.
Southern reporter yesterday emailed to RobertRoot-Bernstein,peuterey, and through e-mail, text messaging and phone calls,http://509421.tw/news/html/?80249.html, please Fang responded. Fang also said they would look at the message. But so far as of press time, they were not respond to the matter.
Written: Southern Reporter Zhuang Shuxiong consolidation: Chen Shi
"Sun Fang debate 'The Whole Story
By fans to revolt
A year ago, Sun Haifeng or Fang supporters. He said the party had considered counterfeiting is just performance. But last March, Fang and others polemic let Sun Haifeng have some new thinking: "I feel Fang attack individuals, engage in the practice of the presumption of guilt there is a problem."
Last March 11, Sun Haifeng comment: "When did you ever seen Fang questioned authority?" April, Sun Haifeng also micro-Bo, Fang's wife Liu Juhua false papers to express their views for the network questioned, "I deliberately Download the two papers, the control was found (Liu Juhua) indeed plagiarism. "
"Sun Party Debate" in this curtain.
Fang pointed out that "with the Sun Haifeng et al standards to found Sun's doctoral thesis plagiarism there." After a few rounds, Sun Haifeng issued a public apology, saying doctoral thesis,hollister,http://www.chengyepen-565310.adminkc.cn, although there are references but did not indicate the source quoted,chaussures nike requin,http://symbianity.com/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=3520276, another reference not identify the original source,tn pas cher, but refers to his doctoral thesis belong to the original ideas and arguments.
Last May, Fang shelling Sun Haifeng, saying,http://football-station.net, "On the traditional aesthetics of the" natural "concept" (published in 2007), is a square wave, who plagiarized papers (published in 2005). Sun Haifeng issued a statement saying that the work is an operation (2002), the original entitled "" natural "original meaning Revisited", when he was on the Internet to communicate with people, have not made submissions. Finally,scarpe online hogan, Sun Haifeng also found in its 2003 NetEase mailbox backups of the manuscript, and apply for a notary. But the same day, Fang was sent complaint letters to the deep academic committee,http://www.baidegou.cn/houqi/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=1115263,hogan milano, reported the paper Sun plagiarism square wave like.
Focus of controversy
Popular Science describes the results of others does not specify
Count as plagiarism,air max tn requin?
About questioned Fang February 7 video response to said write popular science article describes the results of academic research, "Unless you say their views, opinions and not stated otherwise, references to others, is not cause misunderstanding, nor is plagiarism. If you find similar content elsewhere say is plagiarism, have been very strange. "He believes that the Ming and Sun Haifeng, who also is with the academic requirements to claim his popular science articles.
Fang said, Root-Bernstein's argument about plagiarism inconsistent with most people, "he said referencing its thing, even if attribution is plagiarism, but without his consent, which is a unique definition, with the academic norms is contrary ...... even cited excessive, there is marked but did not get the consent of at most only involve copyright issues. "
However, Sun Haifeng provide videos, Robert said, do original research and do science, standards, two aspects of the work is the same:
"Whether you're doing original research, or introduce research of others, you should always be very careful to indicate the source, you are telling the reader where the information obtained from and give to those who first put forward this view to deserve honor.
But in the video, RobertRoot-Bernstein mentioned the case of his works have been copied in the United States on whether to prosecute plagiarism, he said: "Probably not, because it is very difficult, very time-consuming money and time,http://www.z-tech.jp/bbs1/sunbbs.cgi?mode=form&no=5096&page=, the possibility of obtaining compensation very small. "