找回密码
 立即注册
查看: 177|回复: 0
打印 上一主题 下一主题

for example

[复制链接]

2

主题

2

帖子

34

积分

新手上路

Rank: 1

积分
34
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2014-10-11 13:33:02 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
Hong Beijing March 29, according to Voice of China "News" 8:40 report,mulberry sale, invite friends and family gathered together,air max pas cher, could have been a happy thing, can Mr. Zhang, who lives in Beijing is concerned, it is a tragedy. Old friend Gary at the banquet drunk, driving home Shihai adhere to the way crashed into a guardrail, was killed.
Just because Zhang lost friends and remorse when suddenly received a court summons, the plaintiff was actually Gary's family. Gary Zhang family insisted that because there is no time to stop drunk driving friends, in this incident also have a responsibility, then successfully sued to Zhang,doudoune moncler pas cher, Zhang prosecution claims 170,000 yuan. At present, Beijing Shunyi Court has accepted the case.
In accordance with China's existing laws, whether people need friends because of drunk driving and failure to stop bear responsibility? For details, we connect professor China University of Political Hong Daode for analysis.
Moderator: Gary Zhang's family sued the reason, whether you think it sufficient?
Hong Daode: Gary's family filed a civil suit in law or justified. Since the death of Gary is from his drunk driving, he was drunk at the banquet,lancel pas cher, Mr. Zhang,woolrich donna, Zhang banquet which means drinking behavior is a cause of Gary drunk driving causing death, in their there is a causal relationship between, and Zhang should have foreseen the consequences of such hazards may occur,http://www.xiaocounty.com/thread-1225322-1-1.html, for him overconfident or negligent and did not notice, so from a civil law perspective,http://law.ha.cn/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=594169, he has to bear some legal responsibility, Therefore, it should be said Gary families sue in law or justified.
Moderator: Those who drink wine on the table and Gary together, they knew Gary need to drive, but did not stop his drinking behavior, how they should be the burden of civil or criminal liability it?
Hong Daode: This should tell there is no causal relationship between the law on each other from the point of view in this case,abercrombie pas cher, mainly because they have a happy event,http://www.hwqjr.com/bbs/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=29917, Mr. Zhang held a banquet, and then invite their friends and family together to celebrate,http://www.aizsy.com/bbs/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=93443&fromuid=24273, from this perspective Mr. Zhang for his invited guests bears to protect their personal safety and property security obligations, as among his invited guests at the banquet toast each other above the mutual expression of joy, this from a legal perspective,http://forum.youthcancercoalition.org/profile.php?id=6900, does not constitute between each other's obligations have attention personal safety and property security law on each other. Therefore, the present case, the death of Gary,hollister france, should bear legal responsibility is Gary,abercrombie pas cher,http://bloggingmetablog.com/forum/profile/fhtyjhfy3, do not relate to other people who attended the banquet.
Moderator: Now that this case is still pending which, you think what lessons should we draw?
Hong Daode: lawsuit them,http://anju100.net/news/html/?1835.html, we can see that the cause lies in the Ku drunk driving, we had an accident,air jordan pas cher, causing bodily death, that the consequences are very painful,http://www.knownicing.com/forum/profile.php?id=39874, and this tells us that any of us should pay attention to do such a basic requirement is not drinking and driving,hogan, driving do not drink, what we usually say,air jordan, do not drink driving, driving do not drink. We believe that with the social phenomenon of the growing importance of drunk driving, our future more people will assume the responsibilities and obligations associated in this respect, for example, the future of co-drinkers, drinking provides a forum for people and ride People who drink driving we have a duty: to stop people drinking driving. The driver I should be drinking more wine is not driving, if you want to drive, not be able to drink. We must do the drinking and driving these two things strictly to distinguish, as long as strict distinction,mulberry outlet, drunk driving this phenomenon, the phenomenon of life and property caused great harm to the consequences can be completely prevent live.
回复

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

本版积分规则

j關於我們
尚未設置

Archiver|手机版|小黑屋|一起主機網  

Copyright 2013 最新最精彩-社区论坛 版权所有 All Rights Reserved.

Powered by Discuz! X3.1

© 2001-2013 Comsenz Inc.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表