R6OydQgQML

hjemwnn4761

Expulsion of a storm, at first glance disaster from microblogging bomb, but in reality the lack of communication of refraction. If the student can appeal smooth on up, if the school can timely feedback, then the cafeteria food is trivial, not to evolve into a "network vent" event. In modern education, the school and the student's role, not simply administrators and managers,tiffany outlet, listening to student voices, accepted the opinions expressed, not only to resolve conflicts on campus "trump card", is to achieve democratic management of schools' compulsory . "
- Editor
Student: dissatisfaction with canteen services, microblogging criticized the president
?
School: online spreading rumors, slanderous school
For Wu Yang (pseudonym), these days have been "fired" in shadow. As Shenzhen Second Senior Technical school students, because on the microblogging criticized the school, the school is punishable by expulsion punishment.
Although Wu Yang microblogging has already been removed, but the material in a school, and a detailed record of someone's released his micro-blog, which relates to the quality of school meals, canteen management dissatisfaction,air max pas cher, as well as school principals questioning and criticism.
It is understood that on March 11, the media exposure of the school food quality issues. A few days later, school leaders find Wu Yang conversation, he then deleted the related microblogging. April 7, Wu Yang in the homeroom teacher, "do the work", the signature issued admit microblogging, also handed JianTaoShu next day.
Lets Wu Yang did not expect that, on April 26, the school in the absence of communication with students, parents, announced the "decision regarding the granting of student expulsion of Wu Yang." May 6, Wu Yang officially leave school.
Reporters search found microblogging service for the school canteen dissatisfied comments abound. Among the many students to express their views, why expel Wu Yang?
According to reports, Wu Yang processing is based on the school issued in 2012, "the student disciplinary approach",louboutin pas cher,http://bbs.kengbi.com/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=1289188, which states: non-use of the Internet to engage in illegal activities and discipline, the process for the use of the Internet, there are published, reproduced or transmitted in related information, depending on the circumstances given above demerits punishment. The school said the quality problems for school meals, very few students in the online spreading rumors, malicious slander, incitement to strike a collective buying takeaway meals,http://duoduo.yes123e.84684.net/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=70563, seriously disturbed the normal order of teaching school life. Which, in the case of Wu Yang canteen operating companies have improved service, still in line to continue fabricating facts, wanton abuse, resulting in a very bad influence.
"According to the nature of someone's speech of students, consequences, understanding attitudes and subsequent behavior, the school of the Council of careful study, Yang Wu made expulsion punishment." This Jiaoxueshengchu Director Weng Bo said.
School admits, "fabricated facts" mainly refers microblogging mentioned Shenzhen Second Senior Technical School principals and school canteens or deposit Wang Hailong transfer of benefits relationship. The school denied this information, expressed its willingness to open the canteen legal, licenses,http://www.artisancrew.com, tenders and other information.
It is understood that Wang Hailong with the other three principals, vice principals at the school at the meeting made a decision on punishment for Wu Yang, while the four principals, no one contact with the students. "We are mainly based on case study reported Jiaoxueshengchu to decide." School party committee member, vice president Yu Ye Jun said.
Controversy: expulsion grounds far-fetched, no third party identified
?
Turnaround: punishment has not been filed, the school accepts apology
Expelled from school for reasons given, Wu Yang and his family did not agree. Wu Yang's sister believes that Wu Yang just forwards related to it, and does not belong to fake it, and afterwards also the first time remove micro-blog,hollister france, and said in JianTaoShu the "learned a lesson and will no longer hearsay, blindly follow the trend." Ms. Wu told school leaders ask another student penalties arising from either case, "I heard that student attitude is very good, so all right."
However, the school has repeatedly stressed that Wu Yang, poor attitude, for their mistakes not know the place. Weng Bo said, the school at the time of verification microblogging sources identified Wu Yang sent microblogging client with the iPad, they would ask the same dormitory who their iPad, Wu Yang "framed" the same dormitory students, "shirk responsibility,doudoune moncler pas cher, harsh nature." .
In this regard, Ms. Wu believes the school does not have any evidence of this statement. "Only his brother more than a year to graduate, and in the usual school life, there is no violation of school discipline. Backs are expulsion, have a bad effect on a child's life will be."
Weng Bo said, referring to the rules and regulations of the relevant documents, but the views of the main school, the school has the right to make a deal with such situations. But he also admitted that the school expelled the students may need to dispose of the relevant departments for the record, but the punishment has not been filed, the case is temporarily unable to give the exact response. Shenzhen Municipal Human Resources and Social Security Bureau, said that between the council and the school is operational guidance related to the current ongoing investigation into the incident.
"The school as a student is referred microblogging complaining party, there is a conflict of interest with the students in the absence of a third party, such as the education sector, the authorities assessed the situation, school unilateral, coercive, rude to make such a decision, is not appropriate, do not rule out the tendency 'retaliation' is not conducive to the exercise of the rights of students to criticize oversight. "Guangdong Pengxiang Lawyer plum spring that if the remarks of the fact that there is no obvious bias, does not constitute a school violation of the right of reputation.
May 8, Wu Yang with a letter of apology to the school, the school leaders face to face apology. The school accepted the apology letter, Wu Yang and made the decision on punishment if parents disagree, can be brought to the complaint. Wu Yang's sister, said the school will submit a written application to restore hope Wu Yang to return to school as soon as possible.
Contradiction: the school advertised exchange without problems, student feedback difficult to reach
?
Absence: universal communication mechanism fails, campus management needs improvement
Student body on campus, why choose microblogging criticized the school? In the school management, whether or not we listen to the student voice channels? For express the views of students, the school is how to deal with it?
The school said in a note, has been the school attaches great importance to communication and exchange between the school and the students,louboutin, the establishment of a teacher, dean,herve leger sale, student at student work for the chain liaison mechanism; set up a committee in the student meal ; the establishment of a principal-mail,scarpe hogan, etc., to broaden the students' speech channels. "Students can be full, open,hogan outlet, free, and easy to reflect learning,http://www.vacation-denmark.co.uk/cgi-bin/links/add.cgi, life problems, school students reflect on any case have to be a timely response."
But the situation with the school student feedback but say different. "For school meal prices, lower quality issues, we reflect on many occasions to the school,http://bbs.gztjt.com/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=83753, but has not been back." One student bluntly, there have been two principal position, once a speech at the flag-raising ceremony, telling everyone to "occasionally eat insects,http://bbs.jingyingbb.com/read.php?tid=169467&ds=1, wire is normal, "so we do not make trouble. After school meal poor media exposure, president delivered a televised speech specifically, "to tell you the school has channels to reflect, do not look for the media."
As for the school said channels of communication, the students generally said, "did not respond, very smooth." "Principal few appearances, one can see up to one semester or two back,hollister sale, let alone publish contact details of reflecting problems, have not responded." School, a classmate surnamed Zhong said.
"Whether it is a technical school or general high students on the express wording, may be inappropriate, but the intention is not necessarily bad, do not necessarily have 'arise to harm'." Shenzhen Li, a middle school teacher,moncler sito ufficiale, said the students through the network published inappropriate speech is immature, but it just reflects a lack of communication between students and schools in the management, lack of attention when the students' opinions and responses, can only use the Internet to vent their dissatisfaction, cause for concern.
"Students also belong to a minor stage, not mature." Engaged in teaching at a technical school teacher Chen said that at this stage the network popularity,louboutin femme, awash in information on students' emotional,http://www.bmw-kansai.net, judgment,http://forum.radio4.ru/cgi-bin/search.cgi, such as education and training, more and more blurred, "could also just head teacher will do this work." She said that if schools can establish an effective communication mechanism, and to respond promptly student opinions and suggestions to solve the problem, it will greatly facilitate the management of the school, the school students will also have a strong sense of identity and belonging.
(Original title: Comments microblogging school students expelled (student voices who listen))