找回密码
 立即注册
查看: 161|回复: 0
打印 上一主题 下一主题

tVER5vqFTS

[复制链接]

12

主题

12

帖子

76

积分

注册会员

Rank: 2

积分
76
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2014-10-21 03:58:19 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
Jinghua Times (Reporter Sun Siya) working in Beijing for nearly 10 years female engineer Dan Chen (a pseudonym) because of differences in marriage, their parents and their hired four strange men forcibly seized and turned over to Beijing Hui Long Guan Hospital,http://117.21.174.74/upload/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=6767334, nearly 72 involuntary hospitalization hours. Since then, Chen Dan to infringe the autonomy, the right to personal freedom and physical Huilongguan Hospital court. Yesterday, reporters learned, after losing the first trial,nike requin pas cher, Chen Dan appeal, City Court hearing the case of second instance.
Chen Dan to work independently in Beijing
Life for many years, because their parents opposed their relationship with their parents while the long-term existence of contradictions. Chen Dan said, June 5,veste moncler homme pas cher,http://www.blianw.com/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=292215, 2012, Chen Dan parents came to Beijing from his home,abercrombie france, hire someone to Chen Danqiang line into Beijing Hui Long Guan Hospital. June 8 through expert consultation that Chen Dan "is not suitable for hospitalization" and allow it to leave. To discharge only, Chen Dan has lost nearly 72 hours of personal freedom.
Chen Dan after discharge in the network announced its "being mentally ill," the encounter,tn femme, caused widespread concern in the media and society. July 2012, Dan Chen to Beijing Hui Long Guan Hospital,http://forum.ea3w.com/?mod=spacecp&ac=blog&blogid=, Changping court violated his right to decide independently, personal liberty,tn prix, the right body. After the trial,moncler femme,http://www.th567.cn/news/html/?287628.html, in November 2013 the Court of First Instance ruled that there was no fault in Beijing Hui Long Guan Hospital, Chen Dan hospitalized to receive treatment during hospitalization as well as the behavior of the decision to discharge, so do not assume the tort liability, dismissed Chen Dan prosecution. Chen Dan appealed his conviction appeal.
Second instance Chen Dan alleged behavior clinic medical institutions must strictly abide by the laws and regulations. Beijing Hui Long Guan Hospital, made in the absence of disease diagnosis, against her will,http://friend.chinatmf.com/site/?action-viewcomment-itemid-11, and their agents and there is no right of parents to sign conflict of illegal medical contract, forced hospitalization, illegal deprivation of liberty,chaussure pas cher homme nike, there is a serious fault. Verdict that the respondent hospital no fault of view there is no legal basis for requesting the second instance court commuted the law.
Beijing Hui Long Guan Hospital,http://safemarketlink.com/Requests/profile.php?id=6947,air jordan soldes, said that for unmarried adults,http://www.yiliangren.com/home.php?mod=spacecp&ac=blog&blogid=, parents are their legal guardians, have the right to make decisions on behalf of the hospital. Admitted to the hospital based on the history of parents, if not ill Chen Dan, parents can not send their hospitalization. Legal basis for compulsory hospitalization is "Beijing Mental Health Bill," serious harm mental illness, the hospital is out of Dan Chen health care and force it to be hospitalized for observation.
In this regard,http://bbs.wenlushi.com/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=417707,tn air max pas cher, Chen Dan countered that the ability to judge the behavior of adults and whether a guardian should be subject to judicial procedures, doctors have no right to judge. She said that their own rights and participate in public are hoping to promote institution building humble heart,louboutin soldes, even if it is the victim of a similar reduction,air jordan xiii, the biggest wish is the future of society is mentally ill does not happen again,chaussure requin nike, every citizen rights and personality can truly be respected.
The case is not in court for sentencing.
(Original title: Women "is mentally ill" v Hospital second instance court)
回复

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

本版积分规则

j關於我們
尚未設置

Archiver|手机版|小黑屋|一起主機網  

Copyright 2013 最新最精彩-社区论坛 版权所有 All Rights Reserved.

Powered by Discuz! X3.1

© 2001-2013 Comsenz Inc.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表