Vo5f43C0ON

hj突然vjz9l

Tianjin Network (City Express reporter Gao red) due to too much money to see a doctor husband to her mother, daughter actually wanted to kill her mother. Recently, the Hexi District Prosecutor's Office to prosecute the defendant intentionally killed her mother, Mr. Han (attempted) case,abercrombie femme, by the Hexi district court verdicts. While Mr. Han did not confess, but also to provide counsel pleaded not guilty, but the court held that the evidence submitted by the prosecutor can prove the defendant's criminal facts, and thus support the allegations views west Procuratorate of intentional homicide (attempted) sentenced the defendant to Korea a term of imprisonment of four years.
Case playback
"Kill her, give you 20,000 per person."
The investigation, Mr. Han and Xu Moumou after marriage, because too Xu Moumou money to cure his mother to a long-term (89 years), the cost of hiring a nanny and other expenses too large disgruntled, to get rid of the burden to produce killed some of the evil. In early 2009, Mr. Han in Hexi District, his home, to be applied to a particular evil, Wuzui, choking, being a nanny Moumou discouraged. Later, Xu Moumou Moumou told the matter, after they quit this nanny job.
Between September to November 2009, Mr. Han has repeatedly instigated at home at the same time nanny hired Moumou, Hu Moumou to help its killing certain that you can take advantage of the time to a toilet with a towel on his Wu Si, and said something After a commission to 20,000 yuan per person. Two nannies feel something is wrong, refused, and the matter told the Xu Moumou. Later, Xu Moumou informant, the public security organs will be Mr. Han captured.
The defendant argued
"Just to vent, really do not want to harm her mother."
After the Hexi District Procuratorate Prosecution Division accepted the case, Mr. Han Moumou excuse themselves with the nanny, Hu Moumou say killed her mother, then a decompression vent, is not really going to kill her mother. Mr. Han's behavior because only stay in abetting stage, less exposed their crimes, the individual key witness could not be contacted to give evidence in this case is fixed and accurately determined to bring a certain degree of difficulty.
To ascertain the facts, the contractor who promptly nanny Moumou testimony were reviewed, let Han and nanny for conversation recording to confirm the identification of Mr. Han and Xu Moumou family property cases, the transfer of Mr. Han relevant character evidence. After a comprehensive analysis of the evidence, the contractor who believe that Mr. Han to get rid of the burden of his mother brought instigated the killing of the victim's nanny process has been very clear, there is ample evidence, facts and circumstances of the crime are the appropriate evidence to prove. Mr. Han's excuse is not only inconsistent with the facts of the case, more perverse.
Trial Results
The court found constituted intentional homicide (attempted)
Trial, Mr. Han is still pleaded not guilty, their counsel that Mr. Han did not kill intentionally subjective and objective did not cause any consequences, but Mr. Han's behavior constituted a crime even if, it should be recognized as a crime rather than the crime of attempted prepare, so make identification Korea part of a manslaughter facts are unclear, insufficient evidence of innocence comments.
Han questioning by prosecutors in court and present relevant evidence, and evidence analysis demonstrates that facts of this case clearly show in front of the judges. Also pointed out that Mr. Han abetting two nannies implementation is the mother deliberately deprive criminals of their lives, although the two nannies rejected this, and did not implement the killings, but abetting acts of Mr. Han has been completed, which constitutes a crime against babysitter whether to implement homicide constraints.
Prosecutors believe that Mr. Han abetting killings in full compliance with intentional homicide of criminal law and abettor provision shall be deemed intentional homicide (attempt), should be punished by law. Ultimately, the court fully adopted the facts of the crime and qualitative observations of Hexi District Prosecutor's indictment, made the above verdict.