abercrombie soldes the husband Jiang Lei and the "mini three children

xs59t32xk

and the behavior of the defendant Jiang Lei's gift is based on its improper relationship between an affair with the defendant willows,abercrombie soldes, contrary to public order and morals,giuseppe zanotti homme, but also contrary to the fair, so the gift invalid. Now accused Jiang Lei said the return of the disputed payments directly to the plaintiff,air max bw pas cher, so the defendant shall be returned to the plaintiff willow 107 million yuan.Court verdict that the accused Jiang Lei invalid acts involving the donation of $ 107 million made between the defendant willow October 21.
pay monthly living expenses and deposits to the account of two defendants for common consumption; rental contract in duplicate, renew a single one,hollister roma est, to prove Jiang Lei hit 6,300 yuan per month shall be delivered to her monthly rent for the period the defendant to pay the rent and the rent willow.The court held that the property relations during the marriage the couple made subsisting, jointly owned by all; not because of the daily needs of the jointly owned property to make important treatment decisions, both spouses should be negotiated consensus.The Court also held that the defendant Jiang Lei during and Willow are living together have 82 million money transfers paid in addition to Yang and other money not paid in addition,hogan outlet, significant and willow the two defendants accused of living together and living conditions inconsistent with common sense of everyday life, and the defendant in the trial process willow statement also accused Jiang Lei, speaking at the transfer of two people accused of subsidies willow talk about friends, so consideration, comments on the defendant willow difficult admissible. Combined with the fact that the defendant Jiang Lei married, the court finds that the defendant Jiang Lei funds delivered to the defendant willow gift.Willow on whether money should be returned to the above,zanotti sneakers, the court held that the defendant Jiang Lei accused the large willow gift money,moncler uomo, neither for daily needs,hogan outlet, but also co-owners of property without the consent of the plaintiff as serious damage to the property rights of the plaintiff.
2009, Jie Ding Lei Jiang met her husband was still a drama school students willow,air max one, the two quickly developed into lovers. October 2009 between 21 to 12 period in February 2013,felpe hollister, Jiang Lei has 82 transfers totaling 107 million yuan to Willow.After the matter was brought to light, Jiang Lei wrote repentance mistaken, but Ding Jie unbearable anger. Recently, her husband unauthorized disposition of jointly owned property,hollister, violation of their property rights grounds, the husband Jiang Lei and the "mini three children,giuseppe zanotti sneakers," Willow told litigation forum,air max one, requiring the return of 107 million yuan willow.First instance verdict invalid giftOn the court, the original defendant war of words, each side.Ding Jie plaintiff alleged that he and Jiang Lei married in 2003. 1.07 million yuan was their matrimonial property, the husband without his own consent gifts to others,hollister uk sale, the Department of unauthorized punishment,tiffany milano, a violation of her property rights, and the willow acquire the property in violation of the relevant provisions of the Civil Code provisions of public order and good morals principles and the Marriage Law, shall be null and void. It is asking the court to confirm involving 107 million yuan donation to the Willow behavior Jiang Lei made invalid; the defendant to return plaintiff willow 107 million yuan.Jiang Lei defendant did not appear in court.
only a written reply said that since October 2009, he was without the plaintiff agreed to grant the defendants jointly owned property willow for their consumption, now agree that the plaintiff's claim and agreed to refund the full amount directly to the the plaintiff.Willow defendant said that he and Jiang Lei began dating in August 2009, from February 2010 to live together,piumini moncler, Jiang Lei, two or three days a week to live. Earlier this year, Jiang Lei married himself knows. 1.07 million yuan are two people in love live together during the life of the overhead costs.
not a gift,air max homme, a gift Lei Jiang did not mean that the transfer talk when two people talk about their own friends subsidies were 82 times, all month payments, money which is consistent with their monthly pay rent rent deposit to the account for their own consumption to live together. During the two sides to live together, Lei Jiang also asked her for any money,tiffany roma, he is also a victim and did not benefit the plaintiff should advocate the interests of the defendant Jiang Lei. It does not agree with the plaintiff's claim.Willow defendant provided the name of the bank account transaction details to prove Jiang Lei during live together in love together with their living expenses.
相关的主题文章：

  
   http://la-bonita.moo.jp/diary/apeboard_plus.cgi?command=read_message&/
  
   http://6dodiscuz.com/glikif5/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=841361
  
   http://www.eng-knowledge.net/viewtopic.php?pid=44331#p44331
  
   http://bbs.jingyannet.com/home.php?mod=space&uid=11352
  
   http://www.fuyang.com/home.php?mod=space&uid=1665457
  
   http://www.vfxjournal.net/blog/item/create_form/1
  
   http://fanchuqu.com/read.php?tid=108351&ds=1
  
   http://211.86.128.2/gjjl/Review.asp?NewsID=595