找回密码
 立即注册
查看: 85|回复: 0
打印 上一主题 下一主题

zanotti pas cher tSZC9O4WU2kEH1bcVp

[复制链接]

6

主题

6

帖子

38

积分

新手上路

Rank: 1

积分
38
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2015-4-26 00:19:30 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
including liability for "anti-monopoly" on, which is the first legislative intent of this law is the same strain . Therefore,tn pas cher, any business,hogan scarpe, including state-owned enterprises, the central level,tn requin, there is no "anti-monopoly law" applicable limits. Future antitrust punishment should be considered double punishment "21st Century": With the increase in anti-monopoly cases,felpe hollister, on the "anti-monopoly law" applies more and more. "Antitrust Law" obvious deficiencies which still exist and need to be revised in the future? Zhangchen Ying: "anti-monopoly law" requirement is a matter of principle, in broad terms,abercrombie et fitch, in particular the implementation of the process, need to be supplemented multiple departmental regulations, guidelines,sweat abercrombie, and the Supreme Court issued a judicial interpretation. In the regulation of administrative monopoly, the process management of public affairs organization abuse of administrative power to eliminate or restrict competition has the "anti-monopoly law,scarpe hogan," Article 51 provides that laws and administrative regulations for the executive and the laws and regulations authorized otherwise specified in accordance with its provisions. So, if such organizations have a monopoly situation, otherwise from its provisions,nike tn pas cher, no "anti-monopoly law" to regulate; no regulations,abercrombie et fitch, antitrust enforcement agencies have been given only "make suggestions" rather than "enforcement authority" probably not temporary,zanotti pas cher, but not a cure. Administrative monopoly as a market economy ills, its economic order free from the interference of the "economic constitution,boutique abercrombie france," but this does not help improve the market order, regulate the behavior of operators. In terms of legal responsibility, first of all,louboutin prix, the calculation of "confiscation of illegal income" is a problem. China's "anti-monopoly" on page 46 and 47 stipulates that the operators in violation of this provision.
reach and implement monopoly agreements (Article 47 of the abuse of market dominance),hogan interactive donna, and ordered by the antitrust enforcement agencies to stop illegal acts, confiscate the illegal income,affaire pas cher, and impose a fine of annual sales of more than ten percent of one percent or less; not implemented monopoly agreement reached shall be liable to a fine of 500,000 yuan. According to the principles of civil law, confiscate the illegal income is filled, that is not because of illegal profit; after penalties based on illegality, namely fined under the circumstances. In practice, this amount is difficult to calculate,affaire pas cher, so we see announcement,hogan, there is no calculation of illegal gains. However,scarpe hogan uomo, the above statute are the "confiscation of illegal income provision" clearly as a direct consequence of the violation of "antitrust laws", and "impose" the word is also clearly characterize the "confiscation of illegal income" and "fine" shall be applicable between the two is not optional "or" relationship. If only fined, but not confiscate the illegal income, not only missing content penalties in the literal sense, but also because of failure to follow the "first fill.
then punishment" path, contrary to the "anti-monopoly law," the legislative intent so required. Should consider amending the relevant sections. In the main responsibility, the responsibility of species,boutique abercrombie france, according to current law, the responsibility of the body not covered by corporate decision-makers, the main perpetrators, the person in charge of industry associations and direct the person in charge, lack of relevant decision-makers of the deterrent effect. Double punishment should consider requiring that the operator (in most cases is a corporate) and the main responsible body corporate shall constitute an offense. Because although the monopoly on legal subjects from the vast majority of cases that are implemented by business operators.
but the actual decision-making and implementation, and eventually executives directly responsible for these individuals.
相关的主题文章:

  
   http://zazna.com/selection/index.php?item/create_form/1
  
   http://www.stay-uplifted.com/forums/viewtopic.php?pid=850762#p850762
  
   http://syrup.mints.ne.jp/diary/diary.cgi?command=read_message&msgnum=110/
  
   http://bjhongenhotel.com/thread-5456-1-1.html
  
   http://www.8liuxing.com/home.php?mod=spacecp&ac=blog&blogid=
  
   http://demo.web300.cn/free8/Review.asp?NewsID=627
  
   http://bbs.xinhang.org/home.php?mod=space&uid=207093
  
   http://www.78833.com/#97666/read.php?tid=954
回复

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

本版积分规则

j關於我們
尚未設置

Archiver|手机版|小黑屋|一起主機網  

Copyright 2013 最新最精彩-社区论坛 版权所有 All Rights Reserved.

Powered by Discuz! X3.1

© 2001-2013 Comsenz Inc.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表