找回密码
 立即注册
查看: 201|回复: 0
打印 上一主题 下一主题

doudoune parajumpers including the "anti-monopoly law"

[复制链接]

3

主题

3

帖子

33

积分

新手上路

Rank: 1

积分
33
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2015-10-5 23:04:43 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
the judiciary and gradually solve the gradual accumulation of antitrust law before the implementation of market competition, and accumulated sufficient experience in this process,hogan online, which made sufficient guidance predictable rules, operators fully familiar with antitrust law and to abide by laws and regulations When the order of competition, antitrust enforcement will enter a relatively stable period. Central enterprises do not enjoy immunity, "anti-monopoly law" on "21st Century": how to look at law enforcement through selected objects gives phenomenon? Zhangchen Ying: Officers on the issue,acheter louboutin, which is related to the startup mechanism of China's anti-monopoly enforcement. Ministry of Commerce focused on the operators to review by qualified operators offered to apply; law enforcement and Reform Commission, the business sector is based on the active investigation powers,giuseppe zanotti homme, or according to the investigation report. Judging from the current practice, primarily to start according to the survey report. Thus, the anti-monopoly law enforcement point of what type of business or, more specifically which company, and the anti-monopoly law enforcement agencies received reports for Which companies have a great relationship. This reporting mechanism for expanding transparency,hollister paris, thereby eliminating doubts about antitrust enforcement is selective.
more open and transparent antitrust enforcement play a catalytic role. "21st Century": the current public opinion felt antitrust enforcement is the stage of the storm or the norm of the storm? How do antitrust enforcement trend? Zhangchen Ying: strong, effective (law enforcement) will be the norm in a certain period of features, that is, they say, the anti-monopoly within law enforcement for some time will enter a "new normal." Due to the vast Chinese market and China's "anti-monopoly law," a relatively short implementation time, so there are still a large number of cases that require antitrust enforcement, the use of anti-monopoly measures to restore the proper normal market economic order, which is consistent with the large growth slowing economic restructuring and political reforms trends. When law enforcement.
fulfilling specific factual and legal basis, we believe that the public opinion in favor of the elimination of anti-monopoly law for suspected selective in making the decision process. "21st Century": public opinion is also very concerned about antitrust enforcement on large state-owned enterprises,barbour, especially the central enterprises Are there legal immunity? Zhangchen Ying: For central enterprises for antitrust,hollister outlet, we can expect the 2011 uproar Unicom, Telecom antitrust bar. Perhaps this can be fully explained antitrust laws on the central rate and has no legal exemptions. Back to the level of "anti-monopoly law," the provisions of the country itself, first of all should be clear,air max femme, "the state-owned economy controlled relationship between the national economy and national security industry and the introduction of the franchise industry monopoly by law" is from the industry in terms of importance,moncler homme paris, The standard is not ownership, nor nationality, so it is not equivalent to the central rate; secondly, it emphasizes that "the State shall protect the legitimate business activities of their operators' focus is" legal ",parajumpers homme, where the law is a broad The concept includes both the law relating to their profession,veste moncler homme, of course, including the "anti-monopoly law"; again, as well as the second paragraph of Article 7.
Tsinghua University Research Center Director Zhangchen Ying. Storm antitrust enforcement is the norm "21st Century": "Antitrust Law" from August 1, 2008 since the implementation began, more than six years of time, why until this year, the beginning of antitrust enforcement by public opinion as "anti-monopoly Storm"? Zhangchen Ying: For your question, you can put it another way, that is even more accurate: Starting this year,hogan outlet, public opinion began to feel and antitrust concerns, forming a wave of concern and discussion storms. This may have the following reasons. First, the law enforcement agencies who will have to perform "anti-monopoly law," there must be an understanding,zanotti pas cher, familiar with the law and with each other running process. This process, in fact, the judiciary, and even consumers, the enterprise is the same as present. Secondly, because the antitrust enforcement cases particularity,veste barbour, case acceptance,jordan 5 retro, investigation, forensics, defense, the punishment can sometimes take a long time to analyze the different market players to make a choice of multi-level market reasons takes a very long time . 2008 was also the beginning of the investigation of cases is likely to have only recently for the public perception of public opinion. Moreover, whether the antitrust enforcement cases concern, also is involved with the focus of media attention related. Some cases in the past may not necessarily directly related to consumer personal welfare, or may be regional, or involved in the industry is not so intuitive. In addition, public concern about the anti-monopoly law enforcement and public reaction to the feeling of anti-monopoly law enforcement. Widespread media attention likely to promote and monitor more powerful and effective.
someone will make recommendations,air max nike, he said: For the reported operator, whether there should be information disclosure mechanism,escarpins louboutin, let the public know this information? This approach is not appropriate. Because the reported behavior in any investigation to verify before, only "suspected monopolistic conduct" disclosure of information at this time,air Max Baratas, may increase the difficulty of the investigation,woolrich uomo, it is not conducive to antitrust enforcement; on the other hand, may give informants unnecessary distress, affecting its normal business activities. But illegal facts have been confirmed, according to the law enforcement agencies should make the decision. Made more open and transparent.
相关的主题文章:

  
   http://www.wozuzhi.com/home.php?mod=space&uid=83026
  
   http://arsenewenger.com/forum/profile.php?id=18499
  
   http://www.infocrystal.com/alink/apeboard_plus.cgi?command=read_message&msgnum=970/
  
   http://jiqingo.com/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=1404936&fromuid=116786
  
   http://www.postyourflasher.com
  
   http://autostec.com/apps.php?q=diary&a=detail&did=111393&uid=10450
  
   http://book1788.net/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=879
  
   http://www.ijoomer.com/demo/index.php?option=com_community&view=profile&userid=181205
回复

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

本版积分规则

j關於我們
尚未設置

Archiver|手机版|小黑屋|一起主機網  

Copyright 2013 最新最精彩-社区论坛 版权所有 All Rights Reserved.

Powered by Discuz! X3.1

© 2001-2013 Comsenz Inc.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表