nike shox Japan and China despite protests and opposition

r7夏花依旧

the United States will have no right to arbitrarily Okinawa "reversion" to Japan. Even so, even under the "San Francisco Peace Treaty" Article III, which did not authorize the United States can shift this "Shi regime", especially the Diaoyu Islands, "Shi regime." From this sense, "the return of Okinawa agreement" is also illegal. Moreover, the Chinese government issued a solemn statement on December 30, 1971, stated: "After World War II, the Japanese government put affiliated islands of the Diaoyu Islands and other islands of Taiwan to the United States without permission, the US government unilaterally announced that these islands have so-called ' Shi regime ', it's actually illegal. "" Now, the United States and Japanese governments actually take illicit transfer of the Diaoyu Islands and other islands again. This behavior violated China's territorial sovereignty can not but aroused great indignation among the Chinese people . "" The US.
backroom deals, are totally illegal and invalid. Japan, Africa and France occupy Chinese territory Diaoyu Islands, and the same mistake again, perform "Share island" farce. This is openly questioned the "Cairo Declaration", the "Potsdam Proclamation" force of international law, is an attempt to negate the results of the World Anti-Fascist War.
if not participated in People's Republic of China, regardless of its content and the outcome, the Central People's Government Yigai considered illegal, and therefore invalid "on the day and about how to proceed, Zhou Enlai in a statement Aug. 15, 1951 in further pointed out:." The United Nations Declaration shall not separate peace ... by the enemy to surrender on terms Member States signing a "visible, reasoned voice of China, China's attitude is very clear:." San Francisco Peace Treaty "of China it is illegal and null and void. Diaoyu Islands belong to the southwestern islands never even from illegal "San Francisco Peace Treaty" Article content.
south of the South Island widow Rock Island (including the Ogasawara Islands, West Island and Iwo Islands) and birds reef and South Okinotorishima placed under United Nations trusteeship system, and the United States as the sole regulatory authority of any proposal will be agreed in raising such a proposal, and that such previously proposed affirmative action, the United States will be entitled to this and other islands of the territory and its inhabitants, including its territorial sea, and any exercise all executive, legislative and judicial powers. "The Japanese government relying on" San Francisco Peace Treaty "dead weight, pretend this Article The contents including the Diaoyu, and published its "basic ideas" in the March 8, 1972. "The basic insight" Japanese Foreign Ministry, is to explain the United States in the postwar occupation of Okinawa (including the Diaoyu Islands) are based on international treaties.
the Japanese have no right to the Diaoyu Islands administered by the United States government. Therefore, the Japanese did not set up in accordance with the so-called "San Francisco Peace Treaty," the Diaoyu Islands by the United States hosted the argument. Second, the United States and Japan called "the return of Okinawa agreement" is illegal and invalid. Issues related to Okinawa attribution, should be agreed upon by the including China, Japan signed the surrender document Members of the United Nations, and not under the "San Francisco Peace Treaty" Article III decision. Thus.
namely, "the San Francisco Peace Treaty" carried out, it is legitimate. Thus, according to the United States later, "the return of Okinawa agreement" Okinawa (including the Diaoyu Islands) "returned" to Japan is legitimate, but the Diaoyu Islands and other islands included within the scope of the "San Francisco Peace Treaty" under Article III of the, also included in the "return of Okinawa within the scope of the agreement "of the, so Diaoyu Islands in Japan also legal ownership. The Japanese government's "basic ideas", is totally untenable. First, the "San Francisco Peace Treaty" in itself no binding for China, the Chinese government announced the start of its illegality, invalidity. Statement Chinese Premier and Foreign Minister Zhou Enlai in the December 4, 1950 on behalf of the Chinese government issued pointed out: "The peace treaty with Japan to prepare and fiction.
and Japanese governments in the 'return' Okinawa agreement, the inclusion of the Diaoyu Islands and other islands 'return region' completely illegal, this does not change the territorial sovereignty of the Diaoyu Islands and other islands of the People's Republic of China. "is said that the agreement on China, completely illegal, and therefore null and void. Japan, Africa and France occupation of Chinese territory Diaoyu Islands issue should be the "Cairo Declaration", the "Potsdam Proclamation" to solve the Diaoyu Islands as a subsidiary of Taiwan and Taiwan should be returned to China. In Japan in 1972 between the two countries, "Joint Statement" states: "Japan to comply with the" Potsdam Proclamation "provisions of Article VIII," that Japan promised to comply with the "Cairo Declaration" requirement and the "Potsdam Proclamation" on Japanese territory restrictions provisions. When China and Japan normalized diplomatic talks, Japanese Prime Minister Tanaka filed the Diaoyu Islands issue; after Premier Zhou responded, according to both sides of "shelving disputes" consensus and understanding, were processed. China and Japan on the Diaoyu Islands issue of treatment should be based on the "Cairo Declaration", the "Potsdam Proclamation", "Sino-Japanese Joint Statement" and "shelving disputes" consensus reached in 1972 for the legal basis of the main line,louboutin sneakers, and not to " San Francisco Peace Treaty "," the return of Okinawa agreement "as the basis. In 1971, the United States, Japan and China despite protests and opposition, in the "return of Okinawa agreement", the Chinese territory Diaoyu Islands again backroom deals, to the jurisdiction of Japan, and implemented in 1972. These agreements the United States and Japan.
相关的主题文章：

  
   http://bbs.szime.com/home.php?mod=space&uid=10974
  
   http://www.wifigx.com/forum.php?mod=spacecp&ac=blog&blogid=
  
   http://usr.cc/home.php?mod=spacecp&ac=blog&blogid=
  
   http://guicheng.com.cn/apps.php?q=diary&a=detail&did=363069&uid=31948
  
   http://syrup.mints.ne.jp/diary/diary.cgi?command=read_message&msgnum=110/
  
   http://www.chineseinmiami.com/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=97536&fromuid=2877
  
   http://car.wswin.com/forum.php?mod=forumdisplay&fid=2&filter=typeid&typeid=6
  
   http://mizuki02.ciao.jp/cgi/diary/apeboard_plus.cgi/