9zrsjK6dDVmwQnGwHO

tatqwnyg01

In the above such circumstances, the author's view is: the right to speak to master the ideological work must be innovative publicity, use of the Internet thinking, so that positive energy come alive. After the text forwarded by a number of portals, public opinion agitated for a time, potential users comments were extreme, many users of this "official website", "official media" criticized the famous "dissidents" a case of people with " Opinion feature rightist "Time for comparison. Thus the authors questioned Xu Lan, even expand its "human flesh search." Originally just a dispute relating to personal ideas, and guessed, actually took place involving personal attacks "irrational" phenomenon. I do not have much perspective on this, just know that universities are currently clutching the propaganda and ideological work to ensure that colleges and universities to promote Western values does not become a forum for the stage attention. Famous "dissidents" who were named, but just hit a new round of public opinion and in the field of governance of universities, their situation is wonderful and good, are the times dictates. January 26 morning, the authors microblogging account with @ Syria Lan release entitled "I Can Go all the abuse, you stand the conscience of questioning? "The long microblogging, some users of the comments in response to questions. On the question raised in the article: "I, as a general public, as a public servant, I talk a little opinion, is contrary to the freedom of expression that good contending it ... I support the criticism, but the opposition to discredit, I do not understand why?? So many people tried to abuse to intimidate me. " This at least shows the three points in response to the fact that: First, this dispute with some friends said, so-called "anti-rightist" tendencies decidedly different, first of all the historical experience of the mainstream media will not be allowed once again restoration "anti-rightist", followed by Xu Lan also shows that individuals respond controversial article .
it only represents his personal views only, and careful opinion, is more and more hope its work to improve the good articulate language. As for causing many of the "abusive" criticism, although there are those who curse their quality inferior factors,christian louboutin sale, but also with Xu Lan "red chip" type of speech to express the way. This bureaucratic official and university years tuning its terminology can not get away, easy to provoke people's subconscious resentment. But its reading too much into the amount of information does not exist; Second, whether it is firmly supported the values of the mainstream ideology Xu Lan.
or conditions of well-known western critics praised the "dissidents" who, both are patriotic intention, purpose is for the country to get better. But in a different mindset on the extent of it, like one accustomed to the point, by the way some constructive suggestions to improve FIG tactful; the other is wont Tucao love to ask some sharp critical comments, but there is one apartment parts of intellectual innocence. From the perspective of dialectics, both are very valuable, indispensable, if they can supervise affairs in contradiction improvement could not be better. Third, worth criticism and shield, will always be those who ignore the ideological scope of discussion.
frequently exaggeration or panic-like "being persecuted" thought.