Qiu to the court

rrt0p0frty67

(Reporter correspondent Jiang Yue in thin Xuan) is married to the man after the loan to buy a house,scarpe hogan, at the time of registration of property rights will add up the woman's name, but, since then the two broke up. Recently, Baoshan District Court refer to "marriage" judicial interpretation of three provisions of the woman's decision to get 100,000 yuan compensation.
October 2008, Mr. Qiu by a friend, met Miss trees, both at first sight and immediately establish a relationship, and in the end of November cohabitation.
June 13, 2009, Mr. Qiu funded the purchase of a house in the city town of North, Central, preparing for marriage, the total price of 550,http://www.cdanet.org/home.php?mod=space&uid=377445,000 yuan, 220,000 yuan to pay back the principal that day down to the banks for loans 330,000 yuan . July 21, at the time of registration of property rights,abercrombie soldes, Qiu agreed to tree lady's name plus up to become two of the common owners of this house. After the delivery of the house, they did not decorate the house, nor to stay,moncler sito ufficiale, but has been renting live.
Since October 2010, the two bickered constantly for life, Miss tree many times to break off, and Qiu out of the house. Eventually, Mr. Qiu had agreed to break up,tiffany outlet, but said the woman's name must be on the removal of property rights registration that this room is to marry the woman's name was added to the list, now married to fail, the woman should get the house share. This request was the woman refused.
In February this year, Qiu to the court, asked to confirm this housing property for the plaintiff a person all.
Trial, the defendant said the purchase of this house is original, the defendant mutual investment behavior,louboutin pas cher, property rights are registered in the name of both parties, are common. If you want to split, then the defendant should be entitled to 50% of the share. And suggested that the first payment of 220,000 yuan defendant may pay too odd,http://www.cqlife.com/home.php?mod=space&uid=1069314,scarpe hogan, but the exact amount and method of payment are "not remember",louboutin pas cher, did not provide proof of payment.
About 330,000 yuan loan,hollister pas cher, the plaintiff has been reimbursed by themselves,http://bbs.mbqban.com/home.php?mod=space&uid=274702,abercrombie pas cher,http://bbs.iqcdn.com/home.php?mod=space&uid=43921, said the plaintiffs will remove income after loan account deposit to repay 2,100 yuan per month. However, the defendant said the two sides together, living together, the economy is confused, so the housing loan,http://bbs.jfmir.com/home.php?mod=space&uid=13364, sometimes after removing the money from the defendant, his salary card deposit loan accounts plaintiff, the plaintiff is sometimes the card to withdraw money from his salary deposit loan accounts, but this defendant did not retain the appropriate credentials, specifically the repayment amount and fails to account for the time.
Trial, the plaintiff and defendant both houses of the current value of this agreement is determined as 900,http://www.mjzcnd.com/home.php?mod=space&uid=1864,000 yuan. The court held that the reference "Marriage" judicial interpretation of the provisions of three, in the real estate division,abercrombie france, should be considered co-owner of the common property of the contribution. According to the facts found, buyers down payment, deed and loan payments by the man, although the woman said investors had, but did not provide evidence, and the man there is sufficient evidence to prove their financial contributions. Taking into account the mutual life more than two years, the economy is also confused, in the meantime, the value-added part of the house should be split,http://www.zhuhaimama.cn/home.php?mod=space&uid=33604,hollister sale, so the ruling house owned by the man at all, as appropriate,http://www.chuanhaiguwen.net/forum/home.php?mod=space&uid=7607, to determine the discount shall pay the woman by the man $ 100,hogan,000.