DR0nTjF0Bh

H8z5fd4uy

The dispute triggered pylons
Due to road widening, the original road pylons are not removed in time, a prolonged period of a traffic lane. A man driving a motorcycle in this night drink after hit Tower cement seat, died instantly.
?
November 16, 2009,Louboutin Sandales, Wolong District, Nanyang City, Henan Province People's  verdict: commitment line tower property unit 20% of liability, compensation for families of the deceased death compensation,3FG2PRV5F3, dependents living expenses, etc. Total 60,[/url],517.51 yuan.
?
Drunk driving hit a wire tower
?
At 22:25 on March 9, 2008, Zhang Nanyang people driving after drinking a motorcycle along Industrial Road,[url=http://www.duboutdeslevres.fr/]Louboutin Pas cher, from south to north, when the line to Guangwu Road and Industrial Road intersection, the motorcycle hit the road Under a cement base line tower, Zhang died on the spot.
?
After the crime scene after the police department to identify traffic accident March 21,Louboutin Talon Compensé, 2008: "After Zhang drunk driving a motor vehicle, night driving did not reduce speed, and the driver is not wearing a motorcycle safety helmet,6m0wgSpI4Y, should bear this accident full responsibility. "
?
Relatives lawsuit claims
?
March 10, 2009, Zhang family paper petition line tower property units and urban construction administration sued together Wolong District People's Court.
?
November 15, 2009, Wolong District Court in this case the right to life compensation dispute was heard in public.
?
Trial midline tower property unit, said this line tower in 1990 by the relevant departments for approval, design, and there are legal procedures. Property unit has been online tower suspension "Do not disassemble, prohibit climbing,494h3dFS7W, high risk,Louboutin Escarpins," and other words of warning signs. Defendant that Zhang's death is caused by its own fault,[/url], after drinking,[url=http://ntcjlt.com/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=3634121]6vR1kFAk64, line tower property unit shall not be liable for compensation.
?
The defendant urban construction and management departments, line tower does not belong to municipal facilities, the defendant is not a line tower owners and managers should not be held responsible for the accident.
?
Property unit was ordered to pay
?
November 16, 2009, the first instance court verdict: Zhang dead drunk driving a motor vehicle in violation of traffic laws and driving at night is not to reduce the speed to deal with the consequences of accidents bear the primary responsibility for the damage;
?
Set on the property line tower units and management units online tower warning signs are building facilities protection warning signs, rather than traffic safety warning signs, there are security risks, for society does not pose a threat to a specific person, so the Zhang's death should bear some responsibility;
?
Because line tower does not belong to municipal facilities, urban construction and management department therefore not liable.
?
Verdict: line tower property owners bear 20% of the liability, that is compensation for relatives of the deceased Zhang 60,517.51 yuan.
?
To December 1 after the judgment issued under statutory fifteen day appeal period has expired, the original defendant three parties did not appeal the first instance decision has taken effect.
?
Experts say:
?
Wolong District People's Court Joe States and that the present case Zhang violating traffic safety laws and regulations causing a traffic accident,[/url], take full responsibility for the accident is right and responsibility for the accident is not equal to civil liability, the case is building together with personal injury civil compensation disputes, the families of the victims demanded compensation for damage to the right to life.
?
Object placed buildings or other facilities and buildings hung on a structure collapses, detaches or drops down and causes damage to others, its owner or manager shall bear civil liability,[url=http://www.8liuxing.com/home.php?mod=spacecp&ac=blog&blogid=]ekbahgmFb7,Louboutin Plates-forme, unless it can prove: According to the relevant provisions of China's "Civil Law" It did not fault.
?
Specific to this case, regardless of the building causing death is legitimate, the property unit is not set traffic safety warning and protection reminder, there is a certain fault, therefore bear some responsibility to deal with the accident.