?Microblogging Recommended | today's hot microblogging

b1kSA0lS3

Newspaper Weifang December 25 (correspondent reporter Zhang Kun Ma Shuhua Li Danhua) Weifang people unfortunate enough to be killed by a car in their own name, ask when the family refused to pay high insurance compensation. Insurance companies said the public is insured, not pay high insurance compensation object. 25, reporters learned that the very fact that the court should get compensation.
?
One day in June 2010, Weifang very fact that people driving their own family van reversing, inadvertently standing on the very fact that after the car ran over and killed. After the incident, his family think the very fact that as owners who voted to pay high insurance truck, made to the insurance company demanded 110,000 yuan for death and disability compensation,canada goose femme,http://mbng.hantasy.com, did not expect was rejected.
?
Insurance company party that "compulsory traffic accident liability insurance policy" Article states,http://eguyi.com/home.php?mod=space&uid=6251,woolrich outlet italia,http://www.british1.co.uk/cgi-bin/search.cgi, to pay high insurance contract refers to the insured and the insured person allowed to drive legally. The Article states, to pay high insurance contract is the result of the victim being insured motor vehicle traffic accidents suffered personal injury or property damage, but does not include personnel on board the insured vehicle was insured. And as the very fact that the insured is insured, the insured to pay high insurance compensation should not enjoy the car.
?
The court found that the system did not pay high insurance loss will be insured loss out on the victims, mainly in order to prevent moral hazard, but in the actual processing,http://www.chrisadamsperfumes.com/index.php?item/create_form/1, can not be unlimited, no distinction expanding Interpretation and Application. Case, the driver of the insured vehicle and the very fact that the relatives. After preliminary criminal investigation,tn requin pas cher, the driver is negligent behavior. Insurance company did not provide the presence of potentially fraudulent cases of intentional or malicious attack situations relevant evidence. The very fact that the vehicle is jarring to death, that is, when involved in a traffic accident, the very fact that the identity of the accident victim became insured, the insured vehicle outside of a third person, not the insurance provisions in the agreement are not compensable the insurer, the insured at this time was the driver of a vehicle lawfully driver. Then the court ruling the insurance company to pay compensation to pay high insurance. The court held that the identity of the parties at different times, under certain conditions and under special circumstances to be transformed from reality,http://pescuitvrancea.ro,air max 90, in favor of correct analysis of the problem and reasonable solution.
?
Link & gt; & gt,scarpe hogan outlet,http://football-station.net;
?
No law will be excluded from the insured victim
?
China's relevant laws of the insured to pay high insurance can become the object of compensation and there is no clear direct provision. "Motor vehicle traffic accident liability compulsory insurance regulations,http://ktok.ocnk.net," it is only defined the concept of the victim, but the "People's Republic of China on Road Traffic Safety Law" will pay high insurance expressed as compulsory third party liability insurance is "third party" Insurance interests,http://cgi.kwkwkw.com, and neither will the insured person excluded from the victim, nor will its losses excluded from the scope of insurance claims.
?
?Share: welcome to comment I want to comment
?Microblogging Recommended | today's hot microblogging