iEZTkdjEtGatnPjeqw

数位柯翰

" GM foods around the biggest concerns is truly safe in their. There are a lot of people suggested that the risk of genetically modified food is recessive, the existing scientific testing under strict conditions are safe, but there may be several decades before "lurking" dangers emerge. Will there be similar to earlier as tetracycline, used for nearly 10 years after it was found that its harmful side. Meanwhile, in the face of this new thing of genetically modified foods, the review of existing scientific methods and standards will not keep up the pace? Many users put forward their views: GMO did not do human trials, but to replace the experimental mice, the public doubts the validity of this approach. In addition, some GM crops to survive, pesticides, insects do not eat, it is this difficult to understand. "Pesticides can grams, grams of insects product, do not grams human?" For GM foods can not eat what problems the Ministry of Agriculture Science and Education Division Director of gene transfer and intellectual property management at Biosafety  said that China is a major importer of soybeans.
soybean imports 63.38 million tons in 2013, its main sources, including the United States, Brazil, Argentina, and these three countries are soy-producing countries, including the United States of genetically modified soybean acreage up 93 percent, Argentina is 100%, Brazil 92%. "Simply put, my family eat cooking oil, it contains genetically modified as scientists, can take advantage of this high-tech genetically modified to promote the development of the society, I support." As to whether the future of genetically modified foods are potentially hazardous, Chinese Academy of Engineering, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Science, said Wu Ming is difficult to answer this question. "For example, if using a mobile phone radiation, so that the people see the brain after 20 years there is no long build-up, with 20-year grandson, and then draw the conclusion a long build-up not long, this approach is not feasible, will miss many development opportunities. " Chinese Academy of Sciences, former president of Peking University Xu Zhihong said that in the safety assessment of genetically modified foods during the test, and take much more than the conventional dose of the extraordinary amount of tests, using a series of world recognized experimental model, simulation, animal test methods, can replace the human trials and calculate whether there are long-term use on human security issues. "The international community has not yet found an authoritative technology, genetically modified foods are harmful." As for the "? Insects are killed, people do not have poisoned it," the question, China Seed Group Life Science and Technology Research Center Deputy Director Huang Guangwei said: "The gene is not a panacea, a gene that can kill an insect, other insects or animals eat no effect. " Breeding "super weeds"? American Academy of Peter H. Raven: "fears of genetically modified crops is transferred from some other crops which.
this threat is imaginary." "GM foods, in theory at least potentially dangerous, so natural and ecological imbalance." For GM technology, some people worry that if transgenic crops through pollination way around to "drift", may lead to ecological crisis. And development of new drugs is different, genetically modified food for mankind's environment, if there are problems in the future, the impact is very large. To innovation must take risks, but the risks of genetically modified foods too, but if you must take the risk? Wu Ming believes that transgenic breeding does not violate the laws of biological evolution, genetic and breeding methods are changing the shape of traditional agricultural crops and breeding at the molecular level, there is no essential difference. GM technology is the latest breeding domesticated human technology.
is a more accurate, more efficient, more targeted qualitative breeding techniques. Transgenic breeding technology and traditional breeding techniques, like biological evolution does not violate the laws of nature. There are those who put forward the ecological cultivation of genetically modified herbicide-tolerant crops may have "super weeds" and destroying the environment? Wu Ming said herbicide-tolerant grass will certainly be, as people like to eat antibiotics. Such as long rice seed, rice himself had changed. "Superweeds" is a vivid metaphor, there is no evidence of "superweeds" existence. Genetically modified herbicide-tolerant crops will not be beyond the control of super weeds, planting of genetically modified herbicide-tolerant crops, other plants will not become uncontrollable weeds. American Academy of Sciences.
Chinese Academy of sciences Peter H. Raven, said: "People are also worried about genetically modified crops is transferred from some other crops which, this threat is imaginary, there are 20,000 kinds of weeds in the world, Many weeds are in the erosion of our land, but also in spreading, some people think that the transgenic will bring such problems, will bring this aggressive vegetation Rather than worry about it, much less to worry about this more than 20,000 have aggressive weeds. " How to prevent secretly planting? Chinese Academy of Engineering, Wu Ming: "After 10 years of strict law enforcement, the current large-scale cultivation is impossible, but do not rule out the phenomenon of individual escape regulation." Recent media reports, sales around the market area in Wuhan three bags of rice, 5 bags contain genetically modified ingredients, has aroused widespread concern. Experts pointed out that according to the current laws and regulations,red bottoms for women, does not approve of any kind of commercialization of transgenic rice cultivation.