找回密码
 立即注册
查看: 91|回复: 0
打印 上一主题 下一主题

orecchini tiffany maintaining public ownership of agricultural land

[复制链接]

4

主题

4

帖子

30

积分

新手上路

Rank: 1

积分
30
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2015-9-11 20:04:27 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
not long on the land, relying on protection of the farmers themselves. But China has 800 million farmers (including more than 200 million migrant workers),zanotti femme, the farmers need the basic social security fund is a huge number, it is difficult to raise them in the short term,scarpe da calcio, not to mention now the government is still limited financial resources, so in a unified social security system the case has not yet been established, maintaining public ownership of agricultural land, land that farmers generally do not lose a final support line, making the farmer workers in cities and towns after business failure,christian Louboutin Pas Cher, there is a way out - home farm. When the international financial crisis in 2008, tens of millions of migrant workers return, if not to, no way out,tn soldes, the consequences would be disastrous! Foreign media predicted that China was going to happen upheaval,barbour, results are basically safe.聽Some scholars believe that protect farmers supposed to be the government's responsibility to farmers to use their land to protect themselves is to "to" land security 'instead of social security.
people will have to rely first on themselves and their family protection, farmers are able to own or A total of land for protection.聽Establishment of farmers social security system is largely the responsibility of government, not long on the land,air max bw pas cher, relying on protection of the farmers themselves, but in the stage of building a well-off society,felpe hollister, the farmers have to rely to a considerable extent on land protection. Land privatization is that farmers risk losing this article can not live without support line, could have serious adverse consequences.聽  three聽Whether it is to achieve a reasonable scale operation from land.
the responsibility of the State to push to farmers. " I think,adidas roma, security and social security are two distinct different concepts. Here that the "protection" refers to the social residents (including farmers) life (mainly survival) security, that people daily life, illness and death,chaussures louboutin, weddings and marriage basic needs, education, employment,louboutin paris, income and other aspects of satisfaction or guarantees, first should by themselves to protect individuals and families, and then the social security, especially in the case of individuals and families themselves can not be guaranteed, it is up to the community to protect. Social security is mainly the responsibility of the government, the government should strive to establish a unified whole society reasonably sound social security system, but in such prior to establishing a sound social security system.
really protect landless farmers to be compensated.聽5. Chinese farmers lose land privatization will last a support line.聽Chinese farmers before and after the reform and opening are new Chinese industrialization, urbanization and economic development has made tremendous contributions and sacrifices, and now "three rural" issue prominent, agriculture is still relatively backward, increase farmers' income is low and difficult to compare poverty in rural areas, In this case, the establishment of farmers' social security system should be primarily the responsibility of the government.
in accordance with the most favorable way since that free use, disposal and transfer, it was only from the so-called "economic common sense" that land privatization to protect farmers' legitimate equity,hollister, so that farmers can not get high compensation can not be transferred,louboutin soldes, even to high prices, by selling land and wealth. The reality is,escarpins louboutin, there is no guarantee the government and institutions,chaussures louboutin, decentralized, low degree of organization of farmers' lack of pricing power and make free trading rights,louboutin paris, land transfer price can not be the final say by the farmers, and even turn to be controlled by others not to transfer; in addition, away from the city and lines of communication,louboutin paris, it is difficult to change the purpose, the majority of agricultural land value-added benefits are not so much. Especially Chinese farmers less land per capita, most farmers sell private land revenue is not sufficient to ensure its survival.
let alone get rich.聽Distribution of land value-added benefits must consider why a substantial appreciation of land, how to balance the interests of stakeholders, how to be more conducive to economic and social development. Land can greatly value, mainly because the state and other investors "seven links one ping" (road, water,vendita scarpe nike, electricity, ventilation, postal, communications, navigation, land leveling) and other infrastructure construction, urban construction and industrial and commercial projects construction and land-use changes increased the demand of land, the economic efficiency of industrial and commercial land is much higher than agricultural land, and not primarily as farmers improved land or changing the land's geographical location and value-added. Therefore, the land value-added benefits must be reasonably distributed among countries, relevant investors and land expropriated farmers, first ensure that the legitimate rights of landless peasants, but also to the country and the necessary relevant investor compensation or return, so that national capacity Investors are more motivated to build infrastructure, urban construction and industrial and commercial projects. The most prominent aspects of land acquisition and resettlement is too much land value-added income countries and developers get too little of landless farmers. The main reason for this situation is not public ownership of land, but there are other relevant systems and management deficiencies, especially the land requisition system and compensation system is unreasonable, imperfect. The solution should deepen the reform of land system,jordan sneakers 2015, improve relevant systems and regulations and strict law enforcement, strengthen supervision and management principles and determine a reasonable proportion of land value-added income distribution.
相关的主题文章:

  
   http://freeworld.webcrow.jp/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=11334263
  
   http://www.gaiboo.com/2001/news/html/?17903.html
  
   http://www.9dreams.net:8000/bbs/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=13408
  
   http://oxygaming.fr/index.php?file=Forum&page=viewtopic&forum_id=6&thread_id=92171
  
   http://xjtz1-amc.cn/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=1893312&fromuid=14067
  
   http://shanghedw.com/tieba/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=3396812
  
   http://cand.qee.jp/link_p/apeboard_plus.cgi?command=viewres&target/;/
  
   http://csktxx.com/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=1195545
回复

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

本版积分规则

j關於我們
尚未設置

Archiver|手机版|小黑屋|一起主機網  

Copyright 2013 最新最精彩-社区论坛 版权所有 All Rights Reserved.

Powered by Discuz! X3.1

© 2001-2013 Comsenz Inc.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表