8amVCqVLmB

ufdx8iz9mxcs

Last March, the people of Changsha Huan Tiejun,http://lyb-ems.com/wp-cache/psbgjrsvaz.html, who presented the petition to the Changsha City Bureau "advanced unit petitioners' banner, to" spur the government to work towards positive aspects of change, "and then send the flag to participate in the two administrative detention nine days.
They bring an administrative lawsuit to the court after the detention, the Changsha Yuelu District, Changsha City Intermediate Court and the one after the second trial,http://www.brightsites.biz/temp/izgqmbaemd.html, which played the day before in order to maintain the original verdict administrative proceedings ended.
Send a banner accused of disturbing the work order
Huan Iron to provide the "public security administrative punishment decision" shows that this decision is issued by the Public Security Bureau of Changsha Yuelu Branch.
The penalty decision said, "March 26,http://snowstorm.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/site.cgi, 2012 0900, Huan Iron and ,http://www.auto-tsukamoto.com/hpgen/epad/epad.cgi, Long Mei strong, zhoujian, Liu Fang,http://lyb-ems.com/wp-cache/usorqlairh.html, who office in Changsha Municipal Bureau for Letters reception at Yuelu District places,http://www.brightsites.biz/temp/rohwztpegy.html, the use of display banners, photographs and other ways to disrupt the normal working order of the department, resulting in more than onlookers,http://www.gielniak-energosystem.pl/cache/dpnqwdwknp.html, the unit approached the staff and security were discouraged,http://www.es-project.net/maruyu/joyful2009121/joyful.cgi, Huan Iron still persuaded. " Therefore, Liu Huan and nine days in administrative detention.
Huan Iron in an interview with reporters, said he was going to send a banner, did not disrupt the normal working order of the department, and therefore questioned the legality of police custody and taken to court.
The court held that the right decision in police custody
After lengthy procedures after first and second instance,http://www.hotel-amira.at/cache/jaejqciieb.html, this year May 28, Changsha Municipal Intermediate People's Court upheld the first instance verdict,http://www.bitax.si/cache/pnedlpriry.html, that the police detained decided to apply the law properly, dismissed the appeal request Iron and Liu Huan parties.
According to Changsha Yuelu District Court of first instance to determine the facts, the plaintiff, who carry Huan Iron written "petitioners advanced unit" on the banner to the Changsha City Bureau for Letters reception hall door, have been gradually gathered dozens of petitioners. Iron Huan, who took the banner to show, take pictures, and send Changsha City Bureau for Letters chanted "petitioners advanced unit" banner,http://www.erta.at/data/cyzolewoqq.html, is "intercepted" and "cut", caused the crowd of petitioners and uproar.
Changsha City Bureau for Letters security chief approached discouraged, Deputy Director of a surname to persuade the council arrived at reception, Huan Tiejun,http://clp.biz.pl/clone/ydsnhduuqk.html,https://www.ubsacg.co.nz/search.cgi, who did not ignore. In this case,http://www.goldener-loewe.de/data/fiiawljyoo.html, the petitioners received before Zhang Wensheng also out watching, photography. 9 Day 40 minutes or so, the plaintiff, who left the Iron Huan.
Court of First Instance held that the plaintiff Huan Iron and other people's behavior,http://www.gielniak-energosystem.pl/cache/tdcnodplaq.html, causing the auspices of Changsha City Bureau for Letters of two coordination meetings and normal liberating work was interrupted,http://gracebrasil.org.br/cache/vnzxozezix.html, and so the council letters received can not work normally. Send a banner controversy focused on whether the facts disrupt the working order of the Complaints Bureau.
Police denied the detention system retaliation
According to the first instance verdict,http://aggeusz.pl/library/upfyrmyzum.html, Yuelu District Court held that, although Huan, who called the Iron mention criticism to the council,http://www.fmajs.com/home.php?mod=space&uid=15384, but the plaintiff, who did not reflect any specific comments to staff the Complaints Bureau,http://propertychecksofmaine.com/cache/clpevwryvi.html, they simply display a banner Ironically, attract other petitioners gathered uproar. The court also held that this petition is being led to coordination meetings and normal liberating work interruptions,http://markt.vaart.nl/cgi-bin/vaart/markt/classifieds.cgi, therefore dismissed the plaintiff's appeal.
This plays into the second instance administrative proceedings followed. Liu Fang appeal referred to showcase "advanced unit petitioners' pennants,http://www.brianleemarketing.com/cache/fnbkdyfrax.html, pictures complicated way on the Internet to criticize the government's behavior did not prejudice the work order, the law does not restrict criticism of the government's behavior. He believes that to send a banner to be administrative penalties is that they criticize government actions retaliation.
Changsha City Public Security Bureau Yuelu the respondent,http://www.erta.at/data/ftndsvrivd.html, in this case the appellant said behavior is not to be punished to send a banner and put photos on the Internet of behavior, but the appellant to take noise, rallies, or disrupt,http://aggeusz.pl/library/xbsvjimcga.html, containment and a series of behavior.
The respondent stated with the penalty decision content is not uniform. Penalty decision, said,http://ariku.s18.xrea.com/x/cgi-bin/bbs/yybbs.cgi?mode=%3C;, according to the detention of the two men was "using display banners,http://www13.plala.or.jp/white_roots/gwbbs/gwbbs.cgi, photographs and other ways to disrupt the normal working order of the department, resulting in more than onlookers, the unit approached the staff and security were discouraged,http://www.wvs-ostrowski.de/cache/gwpprdioom.html, Huan Iron still persuaded" . Changsha City Court upheld the ruling found the day before,http://fabermedia.de/link/cpgxdcaegd.html, the appellant did not disrupt the unit working order and inconsistent with the facts,http://domer.pl/link/gwzwwkiilp.html, and therefore upheld.
According to the "Nanfang Dushi Bao" reported
(Original title: Changsha banner brother lawsuit was refuting)