|
the opposition says is not limited, the most important difference is that the Government stressed that the new chief executive must be patriotic and love Hong Kong.
are considered to be the implementation of universal suffrage.Commentary:It is because of these people's words and deeds, so that our society to waste a lot of time to discuss unrealistic proposition, with no exact definition of the so-called international standards in the world, to entice people into plausible conceptual confusion among so really needs to be discussed problems are not fully discussed. So those who braved the risk of damage at the prosperity and stability of Hong Kong, while advocating all kinds of speech, take a variety of radical actions of the opposition, in the end has a kind of purpose behind it?Raoge Ping:Opposition to a person, even showing and central confrontation, such persons, to become the Chief Executive, of course, the implementation of universal suffrage with our original intention was violated. Purpose with one country is violated.Commentary:In fact opponents attempt and do not represent the mainstream of public opinion in Hong Kong society. August 17 this year, the Hong Kong people staged massive security election, large anti-war march, about more than 10 million people took to the streets, issued his own voice.Deng socioeconomic Hong Kong:In fact, we all belong to the middle class in Hong Kong,http://szbbs.sznews.com/home.php?mod=spacecp&ac=blog&blogid=, usually belong to the silent crowd, many times did not come out as much reaction. But today feel the need to come out, there is a peaceful participation.Commentary:Hong Kong politics, business, academia, more than 1,100 community groups sponsored insurance universal suffrage, anti-war in the big leagues, he worked in a month time, collected over 1.5 million signatures in Hong Kong, Occupy Central opposition, they want to implement the "one country two systems" and the Basic Law.
the legal premise in peace and achieve the Chief Executive by universal suffrage in 2017.Chow "aul suffrageAnti account in "Major League Convenor:Think about it, Hong Kong is a city of 700 million people, almost five people have a stand out, so I think, "accounting for the" sound that regard,http://6dodiscuz.com/glikif5/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=159958, immediately lower down, they also understand. Opposition parties they also know that they can not be set regardless of the wishes of 150 million people.Moderatoret's analyze what the difference between the so-called opposition political reforms line with the SAR Government, he said to one person, but this one is very important to the Government, one vote is very important, in front of a universal suffrage upon. Next look at is how to nominate it, the Government is subject to the Nominating Committee agreed to this,doudoune parajumpers, but the opposition says is bypassing the Nominating Committee, the implementation of citizens nominated by political parties. 35,000 citizens can ask a candidate member of the 5% of the Legislative Council can mention one of Hong Kong's 7 million or 5 million people the right to vote, how much we think will move.This surface is 2-3 people say the Government.
yesterday clarified the principles and institutional framework of the Chief Executive by universal suffrage. This is considered the historic progress of Hong Kong's democratic development process, but there is always opposition.Raoge Ping Hong Kong Basic Law Committee of the National People's Congress:University of Hong Kong Faculty of Law has a associate professor, called , published an article last January, he advocated civil disobedience Occupy Central, he reasons that is, elections must be in accordance with what they expect, and not in accordance with the provisions of this center and the Basic Law manner. After this "account in" slogan put forward, supported by some radical opposition figures in Hong Kong and foreign political forces is also supporting this political aspirations.Commentary:The opposition has been advocating democratic elections to meet international standards of democratic elections, however, there really is a so-called international standards?Raoge Ping:And there is no fixed pattern of a uniform, for instance, the United Kingdom, they also engage in elections, but they also retained the House of Lords appointed members. For example, the United States is also engaged in elections, but they are not one person to direct election of the president,http://www.h80.com.cn/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=516644, they do not practice what is considered to be in violation of international standards. |
|