"lease ownership change occurred during the lease

jhERk0ufg

(Reporter Chen Po) thought the village without the villagers' meeting decided that the unauthorized 5300 acres of land leased to the village Doo,nike tn pas cher 2013, Yongding Town, Mentougou District bridge household village 384 villagers to the village committee to court . Yesterday,hogan interactive, the case in secondary Mentougou court hearing,http://www.goo-net.com/cgi-bin/goojp/bbs/thread_list.cgi,moncler outlet online,http://jp.reuters.com, Mr. Du was listed as the third party.
Villagers: 5300 acres of land has been allowed to rent
It is understood that the case involves land located in Mentougou original Sweet River Stream village. 1987, Sweet River Stream village households entirety Yongding Town Bridge Village, Township and then it was placed in the field to yanchi town, the land will be involved from the town's water management yanchi station management. In the meantime,air max pas cher, WMS will be leased to Mr. Du operations,http://qinghaihu.co/home.php?mod=space&uid=488, a term of 50 years,scarpe hogan interactive, the annual rent of 5,nike tn pas cher,000 yuan. 2005 is indeed the right of land,moncler outlet milano, land ownership are classified as household Yongding Town Bridge Village. In 2007,http://www.prco.jp/~shake/apeboard/apeboard_plus.cgi?command=viewres&target=166366/,woolrich outlet, the bridge household village heads and village Doo retroactive lease agreement.
The villagers believe that the village should not be allowed to sign the lease agreement,http://www.kazenoko-club.com/bbs/yyregi.cgi,woolrich sito ufficiale, requested the court to invalidate a contract.
Lessee: transfer of ownership does not affect the contract
Yesterday, the bridge household village committee representative said that in 2007 signed a lease contract is the last village. At that time the village committee members without the consent of two-thirds of the villagers' representatives,chaussures nike tn, put the land contracted to Mr. Du, in violation of the relevant provisions of the "Rural Land Contract Law" and other litigation committee of the fact that the villagers had no objection.
But Daw agent that the case belongs to the transfer contract dispute. Based on the "Contract Law", "lease ownership change occurred during the lease, and not affect the validity of the lease contract." Ownership of the land from the town was placed under the bridge yanchi village households,http://www.legalforce.com,louboutin,http://www.milumo.jp, but the owner of the change does not affect the lease continue to fulfill the agreement.
The two sides have not reached a settlement in court,louboutin pas cher,http://www.zgxmzsw.com/bbs/home.php?mod=space&uid=279676, the court will choose a sentencing case.