KeqP6D1lp6

kd27gdf48

Legal Evening News (Reporter Xue Hong) September 17,air jordan pas cher femme, netizen "giant Jubilee" broke "Yao Chen and Ling Xiao Su period distorted memories," said the derailment four times within YAO marriage leads to two divorce, involving actor Guo Jinglin, Honglei, director NATIONAL NATURAL and photographer husband Cao Yu Yao Chen. YAO regard to the "Full of ridiculous,http://www.8liuxing.com/home.php?mod=spacecp&ac=blog&blogid=, people have changed" response. In fact, this is not the first time the giant Jubilee "mouth" of the.
2012,hogan uomo outlet, actor Bai Jing Zhou Chenghai assassinated by her husband, Zhou Chenghai subsequently committed suicide. Giant Jubilee afterwards broke the news, saying that white men still have a little three, they cheat Zhou Chenghai property, sue for divorce angered Bai Jing Zhou Chenghai like. Since then,http://onigdesign.com/error.html, Bai Jing parents sued the giant Jubilee infringement, and claims one million yuan compensation for moral damage. Court of First Instance finds that the giant Jubilee does not constitute an invasion of privacy,http://www13.plala.or.jp/white_roots/gwbbs/gwbbs.cgi, the judgment dismissed the appeal Bai Jing parents. "Legal Evening News" reporter was informed that morning, three in the Court of Final Appeal dismissed the white static parents, upheld the verdict.
Giant Jubilee YAO microblogging exposure whether the infringement? YAO whether through legal channels require huge Jubilee "shut up"? Networks Are infringement? For this reason, the "Legal Evening News" reporter interviewed a Beijing law firm  Yong-taek,http://www.kct.ne.jp/~yokoi/yybb/yyregi.cgi, lawyer for the interpretation from a legal perspective.
The defendant claimed
?
Insider white static exposure was sentenced to non-infringement case
Sina microblogging certification bloggers "giant Jubilee" (the original Dragon Arts are open Investments Limited Entertainment Division Manager), microblogging broke the news recently due to marriage within YAO derailed wide attention. In fact, this is not the first time he broke the news.
February 28, 2012, the young actress Bai Jing Zhou Chenghai assassinated by her husband, Zhou Chenghai subsequently committed suicide. 15:07 the same day, the giant Jubilee microblogging broke the matter, the continuous release of three micro-blog, publish white static was assassinated, Zhou Chenghai died a death, the two deep grudges and other relevant information.
The next day, the giant Jubilee long hair microblogging, involving a third party between the two men broke the news, economic disputes, Zhou mother died of disease by stimulating the like.
Bai Jing parents believed that the giant Jubilee at the facts without the knowledge of fabricating the plot,basket requin pas cher, and through a network posting,peuterey spaccio, media interviews, etc. wantonly spread false statements, dialogue quiet personality malicious insult. Even assuming that the giant Jubilee remarks are true, but also a violation of the privacy of white static. August 7, 2012, Bai Jing parents sued the giant Jubilee infringement, requires giant Jubilee public apology and pay 1 million yuan compensation for moral damage.
Giant Jubilee said, he said all the facts,requin nike tn, without any defamatory, insulting content, disclose the fact that he is not speculation,woolrich italia, he did not infringe Bai Jing's reputation and privacy.
December 2012, Chaoyang court that, according to Zhou Chenghai criminal informant materials, Zhou Chenghai enough to confirm his brother's testimony, etc., giant Jubilee remarks partially true statement of fact, not fiction, it does not constitute libel. Giant Jubilee's remarks, although involving white static marriage, the situation changed and other privacy, but does not constitute an infringement of privacy. Court of First Instance ruling dismissed all claims of white static parents. Bai Jing parents appealed.
"Legal Evening News" correspondent was informed this morning that recently three Court of Final Appeal ruling, dismissed the white static parents appeal and upheld the first instance verdict.
Zaixianbolan
?
Exposure Yao Yao Chen Ling divorce insider said the derailment
September 17, giant Jubilee long hair microblogging "Yao Chen and Ling Xiao Su period distorted memories", broke  Xiao Su Ling Xiao Su due to divorce is not looking for the third, but Yao Chen marital derailed earlier.
Giant Jubilee YAO microblogging exposure whether the infringement? YAO whether through legal channels require huge Jubilee "shut up",http://www.rockclimbing.com/cgi-bin/videos/search.cgi? Networks Are infringement?
In this regard, the "Legal Evening News" reporter interviewed a Beijing law firm  Yong-taek, lawyer for the interpretation from a legal perspective.
Extended interview
?
Microblogging broke the news whether the infringement
Chen Yao exposure within a marriage derailed, whether the infringement?
If you publish content untrue, giant Jubilee spreading false information constitutes public reduce YAO personal evaluation of the act infringes on the right of reputation Yao Chen.
If true, but without the giant Jubilee YAO agree to promote their personal privacy,http://edgevillesupremacy.webatu.com/forum/inubbs.cgi, infringement of privacy Yao Chen, according to "China Tong opinions", the conduct to be punished against defamation.
2 YAO If you want to safeguard their rights, by what means?
There are two legal channels.
First YAO criminal private prosecution may be brought to court for libel giant Jubilee of criminally prosecuted.
Article 246 of China's Criminal Law stipulates that violence or other methods affront others or fabricating facts to slander others, in serious cases,http://bbs.qingwaquan.com/home.php?mod=space&uid=81846,hogan sito ufficiale, imprisonment, criminal detention, public surveillance or deprivation of political rights.
"Explains the Supreme People's Procuratorate, the use of information on the handling of criminal cases,hogan outlet, libel or other applicable laws network implementation Issues" Article II, the use of information networks to slander others, in serious cases, the court shall sentence the giant Jubilee constitute libel, Office three years imprisonment, criminal detention, public surveillance or deprivation of political rights. In instituting criminal private prosecution, while Yao Chen also filed civil compensation, require compensation for its giant Jubilee direct losses.
Second, Yao Chen can also "honorary title dispute" as the cause of action filed a civil claim for an apology giant Jubilee, rehabilitated,chaussures nike tn, compensation for mental anguish fees.
According to "people pass comments" section 140, to promote the privacy of others in written, oral and other forms, or fabricating facts to openly vilify others personality, as well as the use of insults, libel or other means to damage the reputation of others, some impact,basket nike tn, it should be recognized as a violation of citizens acts of defamation. Combined with the specific circumstances of this incident, regardless of the microblogging said is true, giant Jubilee constitute infringement.
3 Ling Xiao Su "big mouth" ex-wife, whether the infringement?
If the giant Jubilee release micro-Bo Ling Xiao Su behest or with his consent, joint tortfeasors that Ling Xiao Su is the accomplice of libel or defamation shall incur criminal or civil liability. If the giant Jubilee unknowingly release micro-Boling Xiao Su Ling Xiao Su No criminal or civil liability.
In another case, Ling Xiao Su fabricating facts to inform the giant Jubilee and request made to it,moncler sito ufficiale, namely the giant Jubilee has not been verified release,http://ogallerie.com/cgi-bin/search.cgi, in this case, as the circumstances are serious, Ling Xiao Su constitute libel, does not constitute a giant Jubilee. But the two still are joint tortfeasors reputation, should bear civil liability.
4 whether the liability of Internet companies?
Internet companies, there is only whether the civil liability issue.
According to "Tort Liability Act," Article 36,abercrombie femme, the network users, network service providers use the Internet against the civil rights of others, shall assume the tort liability.
This event, if YAO require Internet companies to delete posts, but the Internet company did not take measures, should bear the responsibility. If the Internet company known Xiaoju Chun Lei violations but took no measures should also be held accountable.
Text / reporter Xue Hong
(Original title: Bai Jing parents sue the giant Jubilee Final was dismissed two years ago first exposure male small white static Third defendant caused the derailment and then exposed recently YAO marriage within the network broke the news of the divorce lawyer interpret whether the infringement)