is completely different concepts.[Global Times stationed in Japan

bcj26836r0h

but put behind instigate external forces are not overlooked. And "The wind is not long," any deliberate act to disrupt social order must also be handled according to law.Ip Kwok-him: not illegalChairman of the Legislative Council Panel on Security Council caucus convener DAB him, said to be strongly condemned the radicals broke into the headquarters garrison trouble reaffirm society shall be lawful ways to express their views. He said that the garrison defense forces, can not understand why someone would hold the British flag demonstrations, more bluntly, "Some people want to miss England, but went to the wrong place", also known although according to "Garrison Law", the suspect shall be handed over to the Hong Kong SAR processing, but stressed that the opposition will never accept illegal society.Hing: provoke the two relationsFTU hing Legislative Council also "Hong Kong people first" strongly condemns the behavior and criticism, rebuke them uncivilized and illegal practices. Wong Kwok-hing said, broke into the barracks is a violation of the law, if they are the Chief Executive, are dissatisfied with the government's policy reflects the Government can not use illegal impact barracks, I hope the police can seriously about the event. He said, "Hong Kong people first" provocative act aimed at the relationship between Hong Kong and the central, not really for the benefit of Hong Kong people, the state fully support the development of Hong Kong in recent years, individual activists that "Hong Kong independence" is politically incorrect apart more will affect our relationship with the state, is "ulterior motives."Raoge Ping: undermining national securityDirector of the Hong Kong and Macao Research Center of Peking University Law School professor Raoge Ping interview that "Hong Kong independence" elements evident in legal challenges against national sovereignty.
that Hong Kong should not allow the existence of acts against national interests, but also refers to the "one country two systems" is The bottom line, "is both a serious offense collision Garrison, also an act to undermine national security.""Global Times" recently with "I can never Garrison Barracks impact" in the title refers to the event is the first case since the reunification Garrison Barracks was the direct impact of the event.
the rule of law and respect for individual rights in contemporary China, is completely different concepts.[Global Times stationed in Japan, Korea, Germany reporter Liu Junguo Wang Gangqing wooden Global Times special correspondent in Hong Kong Hicredit Global Times reporter Du Tianqi Fengguo Chuan LiAccording to Hong Kong Ta Kung Pao, 6 December 26 waving the British flag, insist forcing in the PLA Hong Kong Garrison Headquarters, the PLA has been standing guard to stop and drove them off. Since last Friday after police garrison troops, engage in provocative thing molecules move significantly Cong said the police has yet to contact him, and notice again New Year's Day action. Hong Kong Federation of Merchants significant Cong strongly denounce evil, the Mainland "Global Times" also denounced the "Hong Kong people first" lawlessness, stressed a similar incident could happen again, the central and the Government should be disposed of according to the law firm.Peter WONG: External forces instigate placePort NPC Wang Mingang noted that in recent years some people deliberately create two conflicts, opposing everything, trying to shock "one country two systems", these acts should be condemned by the general public. He pointed out that young people waving the British flag, although a minority.
Hong Kong's "Ming Pao" on the 19th, said the Fourth Plenary Session will be "big party or large law" issue has responded, but not a "package solution." Fourth Plenum of substantially or eighteen, eighteen specific about the Third Plenary Session of the Rule of Law and the implementation of measures, to examine the results and significance in China's development stage, and not be beyond the stage " Great Leap Forward. "It was also the fourth plenary session of the "rule of law" questioned the 17th New York University Professor Cohen told AFP, Han and Shang Yang is the history of China's famous law school representatives, showing the rule of law "does not necessarily represent the country Council to democratization. " He also, for example, in 1937 Stalin also said, "We all need more than ever a stable legal."Professor of Political Department of Sociology, Renmin University of China Mao Shoulong the 19th in the "Global Times" reporter, said, reflecting Western scholars of different countries focus on governance issues. For China, setting aside the rule of law talk about nation building or democracy is unrealistic. Like North Africa "Jasmine Revolution" in the destruction of nation-building and the rule of law under the premise that they are fighting for democracy is unrealistic. Shang Yang and Han Fei's was not the importance of individual rights.
相关的主题文章：

  
   http://www.jialicar.net/home.php?mod=space&uid=21707
  
   http://gamsa.net/guestbook/index.php?item/create_form/1
  
   http://www.edit.ne.jp/~aino/custombbs.cgi/</"/
  
   http://211.86.128.2/gjjl/Review.asp?NewsID=595
  
   http://bbs.yyxx.org/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=21568
  
   http://211.86.128.2/gjjl/Review.asp?NewsID=595
  
   http://www.xwdlzx365.com/Review.asp?NewsID=538
  
   http://www.shenghuruye.cn/home.php?mod=space&uid=12283