said the phone still reluctant to respond

nmsouw44638

(Reporter Zhang Yuan Wang Kara) Students of Chinese medical science and technology research to get the first prize,tiffany sito, but there is no department of the paper his name,http://117.21.174.74/upload/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=7443127,peuterey bambino, Chinese Academy of Engineering, Dao-pei considered a violation of his right of authorship,http://www.42186.com/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=5047, the People's Hospital of Peking University Huang Xiaojun, director of the Institute of Hematology court, ask for an apology.
3 afternoon,scarpe uomo hogan, the Haidian court hearing the case.
That their contribution is denied
In early 2009, Dao-pei that former doctoral student Huang Xiaojun, by virtue of scientific research in the medical field,http://brookearcher.com/, to get Chinese Medical Science and Technology Award prize (newspaper has reported many times).
Dao-pei alleged that his long commitment to GIAC program (between relatives haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation conditioning system) study,outlet online peuterey, informed of other experts in new discoveries in the field,cappotto woolrich, with Huang Xiaojun had also to visit his own, 2006 The first person to complete the identity identified by the medical research included GIAC program and get the Beijing Municipal Science and Technology Award and the Chinese Medical Science and Technology Prize Award.
Dao-pei said Huang Xiaojun, the award-winning works,outlet peuterey milano,http://www.jrwolvesbasketball.org/forum/viewtopic.php?pid=498296#p498296, the book says Shen award recommendation is to establish a GIAC own system, completely obliterate the Dao-pei's authorship and the contribution made by this violated his right of authorship, therefore, Dao-pei will Teamwork and Peking University People's Hospital to court, ask for an apology.
The defendant said that "talk later."
3 afternoon, the Haidian court hearing the case.
Dao-pei's lawyer, said Huang Xiaojun Shen Awards annexed 31 papers,scarpe donna hogan, and science and technology achievement appraisal accompanying 20 papers,sito tiffany, there are more than 10 papers Dao-pei is co-author,negozi woolrich, or even as a second author, but Teamwork are "Teamwork other "way of tagging signature, which marked that this is not the behavior of the author's name, a violation of the works of authorship Dao-pei.
Since last year, the matter was concerned about the outside world,scarpe tipo hogan, Teamwork always never stand. Last night, Huang Xiaojun, said the phone still reluctant to respond, saying "later (after the court decision) to say,http://selfhelp-community.org/constitute-infringement-xinfeng-wu-believes/," Last night, the reporter contacted the hospital's Office To understand the situation, and nobody answered the phone.
Yesterday, the court is not in court judgments, Dao-pei said that if the court confirmed that infringement,http://ipmanage.info/forum/profile.php?id=8648, he will continue to appeal to the Chinese Medical Association,moncler originale, called for the repeal of this award Teamwork obtained.
■ Focus
Plagiarism academic achievement deposit dispute
Earlier, Dao-pei and other blood diseases nine experts have jointly submitted to the Chinese Medical Association, "the petition revocation Teamwork and other Chinese Medical Science and Technology Award 2008 prize description required by the ordinance." Description,http://cgi.www5e.biglobe.ne.jp/~scale_s/bbs/light.cgi?res=3019, nine experts accused by whistleblowers "fake sample size",rivenditori tiffany, "fake experimental data," "plagiarism research data", "Hijacking academic achievements of others," and so on.
Subsequently, the Academic Committee of Peking University People's Hospital of Peking University and academic ethics committee review comments made thereon that provided in the Teamwork and other materials not found clear evidence of falsification of experimental data,http://www.kbp.aaf.pl/forum/viewthread.php?thread_id=0, but there is a data error, marked unclear, tables are not standardized problems; depending on the material provided by the two sides on issues such as academic achievement plagiarizing proposed by Dao-pei difficult to make definite conclusions.