Mr. Ou said

aq9nm0i396q

(Reporter Zhang Yuan Zhao Jin) overdraft 120,woolrich sito ufficiale,000 produced 60,woolrich parka,000 fines, Mr. Ou card thereon to the China Banking Regulatory Commission to apply for administrative reconsideration unsuccessful, turn the CBRC taken to court. Yesterday,max tn pas cher, the City Court trial.
120 000 60 000 overdraft fines
October 2006,hogan junior, Mr. Ou handled a credit line of 12 million Minsheng Bank credit card.
According to him, after he had been on time payments,woolrich milano, until the financial crisis, such as the company's financial tensions, their personal repayment ability is affected, so the overdraft of 12 million. Last March, he was stopped by the bank card, when in December last year that he would pay off the overdraft 120,000,hogan donna, has been chasing a late fee of $ 60,000 to be.
Mr. Ou believes that bank overdraft amount of 5% of the monthly fees,christian louboutin pas cher, and adopted the form of compounding, the resulting high late fees.
Subsequently, Mr. Europe Minsheng Bank will be taken to court,scarpe hogan, but the bank side,louboutin pas cher, said China Banking Regulatory Commission approved the constitution is based on the charge.
Are super time into focus
In May of this year,peuterey outlet italia, Mr. Ou think CBRC approval flawed,zanotti femme, administrative reconsideration to the CBRC.
Mr. Ou said, when handling Minsheng Bank credit card,zanotti paris, despite the signing of the "Application Agreement" overdraft agreement mentioned in compounding, but did not mention the full text of the CBRC approval credit card regulations. Until the late fees due to go to court and Minsheng Bank, China Banking Regulatory Commission was informed at the bank approved the constitution,air max solde, and this was May 11 this year.
China Banking Regulatory Commission,hogan online, said the plaintiff to do Minsheng Bank card, credit card center signed "Application Agreement" on the back is the "credit card constitution", the "constitution" Article X explicitly states that have been approved by the relevant regulatory authorities.
Plaintiff signed the "Application Agreement", which represents the know CBRC approved the constitution, the two sides signed the date for October 18, 2006. If on the "constitution" objections, according to the provisions of the Administrative Review Law, shall be the date of the signing of "Application Agreement" within 60 days to apply for administrative reconsideration. May 21, 2010 request for administrative reconsideration,louboutin bottes, administrative reconsideration exceed the statutory period, the CBRC and therefore inadmissible.
Mr. Ou turn CBRC taken to court.
Yesterday, the court is not sentencing.
相关的主题文章：

  
   http://www.zhuzhou.com/home.php?mod=spacecp&ac=blog&blogid=
  
   http://0.0.0.0.ehhkzg.maxsc.org/bbs/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=1797557
  
   http://sc.jumenging.com/news/html/?5405.html
  
   http://www.zhuzhou.com/home.php?mod=spacecp&ac=blog&blogid=
  
   http://myybtest.yyb21.com/discuz/thread-869052-1-1.html
  
   http://www.cecyteo.edu.mx/site/index.php
  
   http://888.symbianity.com/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=9254082
  
   http://www.kbp.aaf.pl/forum/viewthread.php?thread_id=0