abercrombie france The standard is not ownership

v57kaerhbk

it emphasizes that the "State shall protect its legitimate business activities of the operators' focus is" legal ",abercrombie france, where the law is a broad The concept of the law relating to both its industry, of course,abercrombie italia, including the "anti-monopoly"; again, there is the second paragraph of Article 7, the preceding paragraph industry operators shall operate in accordance with law,nike shop, honesty and strict self-discipline, social acceptance public scrutiny,giuseppe zanotti, not use their dominant or exclusive positions detriment of consumers. Therefore,hollister outlet, if such operator is illegal and harms the interests of consumers, there is no doubt shall bear legal liability,abercrombie bologna, including liability for "anti-monopoly" on, which is the first legislative intent of this law is the same strain . Therefore, any business.
and antitrust enforcement agencies receive reports for Which companies have a great relationship.This reporting mechanism for expanding transparency, thereby eliminating suspected antitrust enforcement is selective,abercrombie fitch, someone will make recommendations to say: For the reported operator, whether there should be information disclosure mechanism to allow the public to know this information? This approach is not appropriate.Because the behavior of any of the reported investigation and verification before being,barbour femme, only "alleged monopolistic behavior" at this time to disclose information that may increase the difficulty of the investigation, is not conducive to the anti-monopoly law enforcement; on the other hand, might be an informer for cause unnecessary distress, affecting its normal business activities. However, the fact that an accredited law enforcement agency shall make the decision according to the law. Made more open and transparent, fulfilling the specific factual and legal basis,hollister femme, I believe that the more favorable public opinion for the elimination of anti-monopoly law enforcement suspected selective in making the decision process."21st Century": the public is also very concerned about the anti-monopoly law for large state-owned enterprises.
especially the central enterprises Are there legal immunity?Zhangchen Ying: For the central rate against the anti-monopoly,chaussure zanotti, we can imagine the uproar in 2011,pjs doudoune, China Unicom, Telecom antitrust bar. This perhaps can be fully explained antitrust laws on the central rate and has no legal exemption.Back to the level of "anti-monopoly law," the provisions of the country itself, first of all should be clear, "the state-owned economy controlled the relationship between national economy and national security industry and the introduction of the franchise industry monopoly law" is from the industry in terms of importance, The standard is not ownership,magasin nike, nor nationality, so it is not equivalent to the central rate; secondly.
Widespread media attention is likely to promote more effective and efficient supervision, more open and transparent anti-monopoly enforcement play a catalytic role."21st Century": the current public antitrust enforcement feel the storm is the stage of the storm or the norm? How to look at trends in antitrust enforcement?Zhangchen Ying: strong, effective (enforcement) will be the norm in a certain period of features, which is within the antitrust people say the next time law enforcement will enter a "new normal." Due to the vast Chinese market, as well as China's "anti-monopoly" relatively short implementation time,hollister online, so there are still a large number of cases that require antitrust enforcement,jordan 23, which uses antitrust proper means to restore normal market economic order, which is consistent with the large growth slowing economic restructuring and political reforms trends.When law enforcement, the judiciary and gradually solve the gradual accumulation of antitrust laws before implementing market competition, and accumulated sufficient experience in this process in order to raise enough guidance predictable rules, operators fully familiar with the antitrust laws and regulations and to abide by When the order of competition, antitrust enforcement will enter a relatively stable period.Central enterprises do not enjoy immunity, "Antitrust Law" on"21st Century": how to look at law enforcement through the selected object gives phenomenon?Zhangchen Ying: the object on the issue of law enforcement,giuseppe zanotti homme, it relates to the startup mechanism of antitrust enforcement. Ministry of Commerce focused on the operators to review by qualified operators offered to apply; law enforcement and Reform Commission, the business sector is based on the active investigation powers,zanotti pas cher, or according to the investigation report. Judging from the current practice, according to reports mainly start investigation. Therefore, the anti-monopoly law enforcement point of what type of business,peuterey roma, or more specifically which company.
" Article 51 provides that laws and administrative regulations for the executive and the laws and regulations authorized otherwise specified in accordance with its provisions. So, if such organizations have a monopoly situation, otherwise from its provisions, no "anti-monopoly law" to regulate; no regulations, antitrust enforcement agencies have been given only "make suggestions" rather than "enforcement authority" probably not temporary.
including state-owned enterprises,louboutin pas cher, the central level, there is no "anti-monopoly law" applicable limits.Future antitrust punishment should be considered double punishment"21st Century": With the increase in anti-monopoly cases, on the "anti-monopoly law" applies more and more. "Antitrust Law" obvious deficiencies which still exist and need to be revised in the future?Zhangchen Ying: "anti-monopoly law" requirement is a matter of principle, in broad terms, in particular the implementation of the process, need to be supplemented multiple departmental regulations, guidelines, and the Supreme Court issued a judicial interpretation.In the regulation of administrative monopoly, the process management of public affairs organization abuse of administrative power to eliminate or restrict competition has the "anti-monopoly law.
相关的主题文章：

  
   http://www.26393335.com/qxw/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=485447&fromuid=50139
  
   http://www.gxsangna.com/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=73822&fromuid=13493
  
   http://kujiraduki.fakefur.jp/p-nikki/apeboard_plus.cgi/
  
   http://www.prco.jp/~shake/apeboard/apeboard_plus.cgi?command=viewres&target=101314/
  
   http://www.gdgzfc.com/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=1532995
  
   http://bbs.jingduwang.cn/thread-9739-1-1.html
  
   http://chaimaro.achoo.jp/puti/kou/apeboard_plus.cgi?command=read_message&msgnum=48/
  
   http://h2mbbs.com/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=1784896