since Ms. Shao served as vice chairman of the industry during the hegemonic act

lazxc780a

Reporter correspondent Fu Cheng Yi Zhen heart,http://www.cemparty.com/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=99049&fromuid=7751
?
Former director and deputy director of the Community industry,chaussures louboutin hommes, the Commission's Evening News posted another open letter, former director refers to the other side "desires expansion" and other words triggered a defamation dispute together. Pudong New Area People's Court affirms reputation infringement verdict,http://asgard.discuzmy.com/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=711291, former director of Zou in the district at the entrance and billboards posted two consecutive weeks open letter of apology (content reviewed by the court), eliminating the effects. Recently, the second instance court dismissed Chow appeal and upheld the original verdict.
?
Ms. Shao and Chow was formerly a member of the industry committee of Pudong New Area residential area, the former served as deputy director of the industry committee, who served as director of the industry committee. November 26, 2010, the owners in the district Zhao posted some problems existing in the industry committee "To the residential property owners appeal" and urged owners to immediately dismantle the industry committee in accordance with law and cited. At the time, Ms. Shao any industry committee,hollister outlet, deputy director of the industry committee presided over the work. Shao considered inconsistent because "appeal" in the content and the fact that, to facilitate the work of a few days in the form of a summary of the stage to the owners announced the industry committee work. Soon, a former director of the industry committee for Ms. Chow Shao's "Summary" Creating an open letter and posted by Zhao in the area at the entrance and billboards. Because of the open letter have indicated Ms. Shao 'desires expansion "and other words, Ms. Shao grounds of appeal to the Court of defamation.
?
Ms. Shao alleged that the two sides produced a rift in the work, after the resignation of Mr Chow bloom, take irrational behavior, posting flyers for two consecutive weeks in the district, indicating he "desires expansion" and its malicious personal attacks. Zou decree requires two consecutive weeks in the district of publicly posted a letter of apology and compensation for moral damages solatium 2000 yuan.
?
Chow argues that, since Ms. Shao served as vice chairman of the industry during the hegemonic act, resulting in industry, the Commission can not function properly, for himself resigned Industry Authority Director duties. Because the owners Zhao posted an open letter called for the dissolution of the industry,http://www.buyiyue.com/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=70159&fromuid=15269,nike tn pas cher, the Commission, with the consent of more than 50% of the owners,http://mayiclub.cn/space.php?uid=791207&do=blog&id=7221405,louboutin femme pas cher,http://xcrz.cn/service/feedback_look.php?id=1159901, so the dissolution of the industry committee. And Ms. Shao response to these open letter posted his letter, the contents of the letter because of the black and white reversed, they write themselves a letter refuting Ms. Shao contents of an open letter by Ms. Shao Zhao posted in a letter posted. Chow believes his open letter is truthful, there is no infringement of the right of reputation,boutique louboutin paris, it demands to dismiss Ms. Shao.
?
The court held that the defendant in the district posted an open letter,http://kuoyue8.com/hgw/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=40730&fromuid=36337, the contents of the specified plaintiffs' desires expansion "and damage the reputation of the plaintiff,http://bbs.0473car.com/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=125480, the defendant shall bear tort liability. The plaintiff requested the defendant to the way a letter of apology to the plaintiff an apology, and for two consecutive weeks in the district in order to eliminate the effects of publicly posted, be supported; the plaintiff claims the spirit of solatium 2000 yuan,http://221.211.107.114/bbs/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=93780, because the plaintiff did not provide appropriate evidence to prove that it is difficult to stand by. Plaintiff and defendant has served as a member of the industry committee, should this situation, to create a civilized and harmonious society to set an example, both sides hope to learn from it.
?Share: welcome to comment to comment microblogging Recommended | today's hot microblogging