|
|
Fan Zeng Guo Qingxiang
(Reporter Yang Changping Wang Run) famous painter Van but had been described as "painting lines," Guo Qingxiang and 谢春彦 sue, "Wen Wei Po" case, Changping District Court in the judgment delivered recently mailed to the parties . This morning, Fan Zeng's lawyer told reporters that at present only received the prosecution's case judgment Guo Qingxiang, Fan Zeng awarded solatium 70,000 yuan.
 ,maillot basket;
Against the judgment, the parties are not satisfied with the place. Fan Zeng Xue Qiu's attorney, said after receiving the verdict,escarpin louboutin pas cher, she gave a Fan,porsche design lunette de soleil, and made a legal analysis of the decision content to the Fan, Fan is currently no clear statement on the contents of the judgment. However, from a lawyer's perspective,juicy bracelets, Xue Qiu content and is not satisfied with the verdict. She said that from the first instance verdict, although Fan won the case, but the verdict actually avoided some of the content, not to identify some of the key facts. For example, if Fan "paint line" No judgment involved.
According to Xue lawyers, Fan and Guo Qingxiang no personal grudges,peuterey milano negozi, GUO Qing-Xiang Fan Favorite paintings also many years ago. Therefore, whether to appeal the decision to wait for Fan. However,occhiali da sole, the defendant has stated publicly while Guo Qingxiang to appeal, which the lawyers said Xue:. "Then we'll meet again in the second instance"
Yesterday,basket louboutin, Guo Qingxiang party called many media reporters, disclosed contents of the judgment. GUO Qing-Xiang Min Rong Fu lawyer believes, on defamation, specified by law, there are two, one is defamatory, deliberately fabricating facts, libelous; the second is an insult,moncler prezzi, that is true even reflect the problems, but there are insults others personality contents to be identified as defamation. But in this case,hogan, Guo Qingxiang article is a literary critical articles, for academic purposes contend published in the "Wen Wei Po" "Contention" among; article did not name,casquette jordan, indicating Fan Zeng Guo Qingxiang not want to be derogatory personality, just like pointed out that the problems of this social phenomenon.
Min Rong Fu think, Guo Qingxiang Fan while noting in the article had "pipeline" painting,louboutin homme basket, harm the interests of collectors; the other hand, for many in the community to raise their prices for works by the artist, is not to focus on art, and is keen to stir, a star,louboutin chaussures soldes, such an approach to the whole art are unfavorable. Article therefore called artists speak or take work,lunette de soleil, conception of art criticism and academic contention, there is no intentional disparage Fan Zeng personality problems. The court verdict cited four word description for Fan Zeng Guo Qingxiang poetry, painting, calligraphy, painting style and personality were made derogatory evaluation, such as "untalented", "brave", "Hyun was exposed yourself", "hypocritical "Wait. These words appear in the context of context, he believes does not constitute insulting words. J161 J069
Related
 ,giubbotti moncler;
Link
 ,bijoux pas cher;
Last May,peuterey, Guo Qingxiang published "works of the artist or to speak with" one article in the Shanghai, "Wen Wei Po", the artist painted lines phenomenon criticized. Guo Qingxiang think artists must have thought realm, artistic pursuit, not to hype and packaging to deceive the public. Last October, Fan Zeng filed by Beijing Changping District Court lawsuit, sued the above article grave violation of their reputation, resulting in a lower social evaluation and moral damage, and has a claim of 500 million.
Changping District Court of First Instance ruled that the article GUO Qing-Xiang Fan Zeng throughout to poetry, painting,saint fran?ois longchamp, calligraphy,outlet tiffany italia, painting style and personality were made derogatory evaluation, such as "untalented",giubbotti peuterey nuovo, "brave", "Hyun was exposed oneself "," false ", resulting in reduced pain and mental evaluation of its social,cinture gucci, Guo Qingxiang's behavior constituted a violation of Fan Zeng's reputation. At the same court, though Wenhui Group published article is not rigorous review, there might be mistakes, but its behavior is not sufficient to constitute defamation Fan Zeng, so the requirements for Fan Zeng Wenhui Group tort liability not support the request.
Welcome to comment I want to comment
Microblogging Recommended | today's hot microblogging (edit: SN026)
相关的主题文章：
http://www.jdxjxw.com/6018/Review.asp?NewsID=184
http://www.sie.sdnu.edu.cn/english/Review.asp?NewsID=56
http://www.midasuser.cn/upload/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=4324545
http://www.zhuzhou.com/home.php?mod=spacecp&ac=blog&blogid=
http://bbs.114log.com/read.php?tid=1036201&ds=1
http://www.htszgs.com/Review.asp?NewsID=220
http://211.86.128.2/gjjl/Review.asp?NewsID=595
http://www.chuandz.com/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=1196798 |
|
发表于 2015-7-6 04:16:33
收藏