barbour pas cher what circumstances considered 'serious cases'

f6稚气未脱

In recent months, the big ballad from the network, "Qin Fire Fire ',' stand two split four" was exposed to Sinopec "Cowboy door" acting in Fu Xuesheng detained, to Wuhan destroyed a control 312 "Big V "account of the network" navy "company ... a tough fight for the network rumors curtain went up. In this context,barbour catalogue, the two high judicial interpretation will play what role combat Internet rumors,chaussures femme pas cher, the most public attention. The judicial interpretation of a total of 10,nike sito ufficiale, defined the network defamation,nike scarpe, disturb, extortion, illegal business charges applicable conditions. "Now both normal speech in cyberspace, there are also rumors that the network,nike run, and the latter has a growing trend - more and more serious nature of rumors,nike jordan pas cher, rumors are more and more the case for judicial interpretation." Criminal Law, "the four charges of 'how to apply to the network' specific provisions, the impact on the network rumors reality social order can play a deterrent and a deterrent. "rofessor Hongdao China University of Political Science of Road to China Youth Daily reporter. But some of the public are also worried that the introduction of judicial interpretation, especially the "defamatory information forwarded 500 times that may be imposed" and so forth, will hurt free speech and network supervision and reporting. In this regard, the Supreme Court made it clear that military spokesman Sun.
judicial interpretation of the use of information network implementation constitute defamation libel standards, provides a more stringent threshold. Unintentional forwarding defamatory statements are not accountable,scarpin louboutin pas cher, but unintentional false reporting corruption, and are not accountable. "Overall,air max pas cher pour femme, this judicial interpretation of the orientation is to contain rumors, whether it is 'private ballad' or 'official rumor'." Hongdao said. Communication Law Research Center researcher Zhu Wei, China University of Political Science Further analysis indicated that the judicial interpretation is not new charges, but in the network of public space, to what network libel considered "serious cases",nike tennis, drew a "red line." "China's" Criminal Law "has been specified to violence or other methods affront others or fabricating facts to slander others,boutique christian louboutin, in serious cases, constitute a crime of insult or defamation. And general defamation, illegal processing only as a civil tort or administrative. For a long time, what circumstances considered 'serious cases', has been blurred. "Zhu Wei told reporters,air max pas cher pour homme," The experience of some European countries, from the current perspective, for libel network requirements are 'quantification' of. 'forwarded 500 times' and other objective criteria, so that China's "Criminal Law" more workable. " China Youth Daily reporter saw that the judicial interpretation of the provisions, with one of the following circumstances, it should be recognized network operator defamation "serious cases" a) the same information is actually being clicked defamation, visits more than 5,000 times,jordan pas cher, or to be forwarded the number reached more than 500 times; (ii) causing the victim or his close relatives mental disorders,barbour pas cher, self-mutilation,woolrich, suicide and other serious consequences; (c) In two years but had received administrative penalties for libel, and slander others; (iv) other serious cases situation. "It also means that the introduction of judicial interpretation.
more focus on 'combating malicious cyber crime', rather than interfere with normal speech and news monitoring." Zhu Wei concluded. Zhu Wei opinion, delineation of the "red line" of greater significance is that its normal network statement and potential suspects, is a kind of protection. "Clear conviction standard, people can have their online behavior to predict." He said, "after marking in the 'not cross the line' range, normal speech have the necessary protection for potential suspects who will not fear every day, they would be prosecuted with any crime, or 'codefendant different sentence'. " But only on their own law is not enough. Hongdao to China Youth Daily reporter prompt, rather than argue "500 Forward" and other standards are appropriate,nike air, it is better to consider how to make good use of it to the executive level,basket louboutin, the "strict control." . "'Forwarded 500 times' and other standards must be more refined,chaussures louboutin, it will be very easy to be 'abused'" he says,hollister abercrombie, "For example, to forward the packet does not include 'forward forwarding' If so.
相关的主题文章：

  
   http://demo.web300.cn/free8/Review.asp?NewsID=627
  
   http://www.zplu.cn/home.php?mod=space&uid=12064
  
   http://www.nanbu123.com/thread-898896-1-1.html
  
   http://www.postyourasian.com
  
   http://www.leapleer.cn/apps.php?q=diary&a=detail&did=465685&uid=22568
  
   http://www.nj-bridge.com/ad/Review.asp?NewsID=486
  
   http://fellow.focuschina.com/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=138974
  
   http://www.dab.hi-ho.ne.jp/cgi-bin/user/tamanegi/apeboard.cgi/"/