|
the only focus is "borrowing" is actually happened. After the trial ended yesterday,nike tn pas cher, the judge asked the two sides to accept mediation. Lai Fang representation can mediate, but to the other side before the withdrawal, but did not admit to borrow money. Xu then the new attorney said, to ask the plaintiffs and then decide. A borrow did not borrow? Lai Fang "In the form of a legal IOU bribes to cover up illegal purpose." and lawyers refute statements by turns, the basic point is that "IOU though true, is a legitimate form of actual bribes to cover up illegal purpose. Accused Xu and then the new attempt by way of legal proceedings, in the judgment of the Court to ask for bribes. Lai's lawyer said, according to the Supreme Court interpretation of the law relevant to the case of private lending. Private lending,http://www.wabaowa.com/forum/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=18401, in addition to IOUs,nike tn officiel, but also with the specific background, ascertain whether the borrower actually happened. So Lai Fang Xu again requested a new loan lawyers time,veste barbour, place, witnesses, sources of borrowing, cash on delivery or transfer, whether the borrower has the ability to pay and other evidence,tn, in order to verify whether borrowers actually happened. "1998, a monthly income of 1,nike tn officiel,000 yuan Huidong civil servants,louboutin homme pas cher, but where 750,000 new promise again?" Lai lodge,abercrombie paris, 1998 Huidong County average wage of civil servants is about 1,000 yuan, 750,tn pas chere,000 yuan at that time and then the new couple take many decades to accumulate enough to eat or drink for a few.
Phoenix survey reported that during the new public promise again,louboutin homme, through a variety of means by their own name Hung Industrial Co.,scarpe hogan, Convoy and other companies get Huidong County beach 5628 acres of land,abercrombie soldes, of which 18 located Xunliao CMC Xunliao village.
Lai promised Hui brothers, each for 24% of the dry stock dividends. Lai said the completion of the project from 1995 to 2004, has been agreed upon in proportion to dry stock dividends Hui brothers. But there is part of the land, house no cash, so it defaulted on part of the Hui brothers dividends. 1998 promises again after the new requirements, Lai Jinyu write IOUs,http://gtmir337.136.30i.cn/bbs/viewthread.php?tid=14686&extra=, fixed at no realizable dry stock dividends. Xu Lai presented new in January 2004 and then wrote a "receipt", the content is "received Lai Jinyu cross to Geelong Doumen ridge land allotments store ten thousand yuan." Lai said that this is the last time before the promise of new dry stock dividends. In 2005 after the two conflict, Ryan did not have to pay, and then start a new promise real name. Court, Lai from the company point of view that,barbour international, after completion of the project in 1995, net of costs and points to the Hui brothers dry stock dividends, which the company has more than 10 million profit, and later sold a piece of land revenue over 2000 million. From 1995 to last year, the company operates are growing year by year,giubbotti peuterey, billions of dollars of assets, "I did not need to find a new promised again to borrow money, even if borrowed, it is not possible by a mere 750,000 yuan." Xu Fang Did not respond During the trial, the attorney promised another new statement is very simple, did not respond to this. Plaintiff: Xu Zaixin 62 years old, comprehensive Phoenix previously reported, public information and the South are the reporter, beginning in August 1984, has deputy director of the county finance bureau, a bank branch president Huidong. March 1990 Ren Huidong County Deputy Magistrate,nike tn officiel, 1992. Yim bank branches in Hong Kong, Guangdong Shun-ming, general manager (at the level). May 2011 departure from Hong Kong Shun-ming company. In early May this year.
"if the borrower actually happened, where he 750,000 yuan come, need to find out! "and asked the judge to be to Huidong County Finance Bureau and other departments and obtain promised again a couple of new information on wage income. Again, counsel asked the court to summon new promise to appear in court to accept the judge asked again, wrote a pledge of all the talk is true,http://pp.papaxiong.net/home.php?mod=space&uid=130093&do=blog&quickforward=1&id=8311004, false otherwise do bear legal responsibility, and spot and Lai Jinyu confrontation. Lai Jinyu also requires new court confrontation with the promise again. In this regard, the judge did not immediately stand. Xu Fang "Loan details passed many years,http://fnbbs.res999.com/showtopic-11055548.aspx, could not remember clearly." During the entire trial,nike tn 2014,http://lyzb.cc/uchome/space.php?uid=20834&do=blog&id=294246, then the new attorney Xu simple statement, only around IOU that matter, that the IOU content clear, true,tn pas chere,http://www.infocrystal.com/alink/apeboard_plus.cgi?command=read_message&msgnum=970/, depends on the signature confirmation, asked the court to rely on the repayment and the corresponding interest. Xu's lawyer said then the new borrowing occurs in the home of another promise to deliver cash, other borrowers detail, since over the years,hollister, (Xu then new) can not remember clearly. B bribes or borrowing Lai Fang "IOU is unrealized dry stock dividends." in court describes the background IOU occurred. 1991, on which the identity of Hong Kong businessmen to cooperate with government Huidong County town of Geelong,http://bdstartup.org/viewtopic.php?pid=173819#p173819, invest in real estate projects in the region. At that time,zanotti homme, the new vice-governor Xu then in charge of the economy at Huidong County,http://www.infocrystal.com/alink/apeboard_plus.cgi?command=read_message&msgnum=620/, his brother is the vice mayor Xu Nisshin Kuala town, in charge of urban construction. Two brothers requirements in the form of dry stock of distributable profits generated by the real estate project. To promote the project. |
|