even if the card is in the state to report the loss

lpsoiu00746

(Reporter Zhang Yuan Chen Po) others mistakenly 7600 yuan deposit bank card, a bank depositor Cheng will Haidian court, which requires the return.
Yesterday the trial, the defendant said that there is no fault,http://jfy4ghtuertfy.bloguez.com/jfy4ghtuertfy/4856010/apeboard.cgi, "not entitled to the return of the deposit has been deposited in the account of others."
Plaintiff: twice mistakenly deposited 7,http://www.waldschmidthaus.eu/link/wqykyzbzcp.html,600 yuan
Cheng plaintiff alleged that before the incident, the family child will pick a bank card, inadvertently put the plaintiff wallet. Later, the plaintiff mistakenly pick up this card,http://bbs.yapaifs.cn/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=4353568&fromuid=225736, as their card and handed it to drive a niece, Haidian allowed to go to a bank to save money. Niece certain way on June 28,http://hollyspianostudio.com/cache/pdofxnncda.html, 2010, on the 29th two days, a banking hall in Haidian were credited to the card cash 6200 yuan and 1400 yuan.
It is understood that a certain way when you first deposit, there is no information on bank deposits print carefully verified,http://adult-plus.com/cgi/aska/aska.cgi, that the transaction slip signed. After the second deposit,http://www.gnomefarmer.co.nz/link/kffpbyyzgx.html, the bank held a discovery non-plaintiff Cheng Cheng card headed immediately to the police.
Cheng believes that bank-related vouchers user bar at the signature,http://www.creps-pdl.sports.gouv.fr/clone/nzdnmmijhi.html, name,http://www.hy05.com/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=30554,http://sourceum.com/cache/lnacjdyvmm.html, signature were a certain way,http://forum.hostlongisland.com/cgi-bin/index.cgi, and the user name is stored in Wang's bank card, and the card has already been reporting the loss,http://s-tec-tuning.de/mode/ogociesbcj.html, the bank did not carefully check the appropriate information,http://www.harmonie-wijlre.nl/cache/qacsolcrgr.html, not doing the review this obligation, the economic losses caused by the plaintiff 7,600 yuan,http://bbs.lankao.cc/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=122817, it requested the court to order the bank to return the loss of 7,600 yuan.
Defendant: its no-fault refuse mediation
Haidian accused a bank that in the process of handling the business,http://www.grosio.eu/cache/tstbjlhcmm.html, he did not at fault.
"Banks twice trading card provided by the plaintiff himself, two pen card deposit transactions are cash transactions." The defendant said, there are certificates of deposit on the transaction the bank card user name and card number, the plaintiff in the audit has to sign it. According to the principle of voluntary deposits, bank depositors in accordance with instructions. In the meantime, if depositors suffered losses due to their own operational behavior, should be borne. So, for 7600 yuan has been deposited, the bank "has no right to return the deposit accounts deposited in others."
The defendant in court also said that the incident occurred,http://hotwheelstuning.de/mode/jeggvngeer.html, the plaintiff bank card is actually used in a normal state,http://rugby-osaka.org/news/article.cgi, even if the card is in the state to report the loss, still deposits.
Since the defendant does not agree to mediation,http://www.nwd21.de/cache/lvbamfrdpz.html, the court announced the sentencing date.
■ lawyers say
Lost cards can be added the head of household participation in the proceedings
Beijing Lawyer Ding Jing Chun Sheng believes that case,http://journal.appconnect.in/cache/fpzpmokbpc.html, the depositors did not confirm whether the system all his bank card, bank did not make the necessary verification and remind obligations were significantly fault. Even if the deposit is confirmed misdirected depositors, banks have no right without the consent of the owner of the bank card case, I agree,http://byjenniferjane.com/cache/wuwxxbpxag.html, the money will be returned directly to the depositors.
Ding Sheng pointed out that although the bank card owner is not at fault in this case, both the original defendant, the owner can be prosecuted as a third person,http://www.scopesys.com/cgi-bin/today2.cgi, in order to investigate whether the court this save depositors misdirected.