uA3Mdut1Px

DFG2i8DDF

Jianshui three villagers reported to the police, said they were a man named Shen Xiaoyong to "change money" approach defrauded more than 20 million. Despite being arrested after Shen Xiaoyong screaming injustice, or the Court of First Instance sentenced him to 14 years in prison.
Lawyers View dossier has found three "cheated" and the original transcripts to the police, the relevant time and the number of points at the paradox, the amount of fraud identified by the judiciary also is solitary card, which generated over this trial cases extreme suspicion.
Yesterday afternoon, Honghe Prefecture Intermediate People's Court in Jianshui strange since this fraud.
Was accused of "change money" scam
Yesterday afternoon, along with seemingly ordinary but doubts of fraud by the Honghe Prefecture Intermediate People's Court upheld the trial judge in Jianshui County.
Alleged suspects Shen Xiaoyong, was sentenced to 14 years in prison court. This past everyone in the eyes of the wise men, handcuffed and a look of frustration. In court, he insisted that he is being wronged.
Previous years, he is a online pursuit of suspects, was arrested last year,nike air max bw pas cher,f9Y75aGoLa, the transfer of cases Procuratorate. Due to lack of evidence, and the police returned for supplementary investigation. Later,woolrich bologna, prosecutors alleged it in 2002, respectively, to "change money" way to defraud the three villagers a total of 20 million yuan,IFH15I6qfJ, the court quickly finds its guilt.
Throughout,r6Kk2UzPd1, however,woolrich store milano, have denied Shen Xiaoyong fraud. Despite Confession, he was convicted in the first instance court, and according to the villagers reported the alleged amount of more than 20 million, was sentenced to 14 years in prison.
Lawyers to visit him in prison and speaks
One day in March this year, Kunming lawyer Yang column due to one case, the parties met to build water detention center. Since the party has been unable to walk upright in the prison, they be carried away from the prison by , so Shen Xiaoyong grievances to the lawyer shouted, hoping "to help him"! Is this chance, let the lawyers saw the case of multi-doubt.
Previously, he was identified in court "10 dollars can change 100 yuan, 100 yuan can become 2,000 yuan,RnQqW544Oo," the trick way, fraud Jianshui three villagers more than 20 million. "Three ordinary villager, how can so much money? They say is not true!" Shen Xiaoyong's family asked.
Yesterday, the case ushered in the retrial.
Record contradictory report
The reporter got the case of three informant transcripts from the case dossier.
Malaysians who are the first to report,EFjR32Kv1o, this time for the police to register the record November 8, 2002, the day he was a liar, said Shen Xiaoyong deceived the 39,800 dollars. The testimony of a witness Jo,rivenditori moncler, also known as Malaysians said to him was "the next day to go there, the money is no"! That is,vente jordan, if deceived, should be the next day (November 9) found deceived. Why November 8 on a report said he cheated?
In that year on November 11 this day, there have been recorded and Machao An Gui two villagers came to the police station, said Shen Xiaoyong was fraud. Gui recorded initial report said he was "in a day in August, and in Jianshui ancient city was cheated 67,NHKuowY8JB,600 yuan Shen Xiaoyong," and the subsequent police interrogation transcripts, he was also known cheated place in their home town government offices. Machao An in the day to tell the police that he called "Lunar October 23 ...... is Shen Xiaoyong deceived 106,giubbotti moncler 2013,000 yuan." The Lunar October 23, replaced by the new calendar is November 27. That is, if there really fraud,giubbotti woolrich uomo, but also occurs in his report of 16 days after!
Yesterday, prosecutors added new evidence, saying Machao An cheated time is November 2.
"Machao An said three different times deceived, Gui recorded statements of two different deceived locations. Informant contradiction in narrative time, inconsistent on the location, and inconsistent with the witness said, they said Content is also why the court finds as a fact? "When the second trial, lawyers strongly questioned the court verdict.
How to identify the amount of fraud,woolrich parka luxury?
Prosecutors alleged fraud amount is 213,400 yuan Shen Xiaoyong, these amounts are all derived from the informant's oral statements,sLKyH6Ou2x, there is no strong circumstantial evidence. Indictment in the book,Q9VNXm1m38, also cited Shen Xiao-yong is a person with a criminal record.
Court of first instance verdict, the testimony of several villagers, all said they had cheated lend money to three people. As cheated process, all the witnesses have said only "heard" and not witnessed.
Alone informant's unilateral statement, how it was determined the court?
"Baffled!" Section bystander think so,outlet peuterey roma.
Face questioning, prosecutors believe a crime like fraud class has its own peculiarities,moncler quincy, in addition to the victim statements, very difficult to have other direct evidence. Another view from the circumstantial evidence, can confirm the facts of the crime Shen Xiaoyong.
The lawyer believes that the "change money" category fraud, crime scene will leave traces, such as fingerprints, etc.,woolrich usato, but the evidence is clear that lack of these aspects, the Court finds suspected crimes were guilty.
Suspects fate is still suspense
Since being arrested by public security organs,chaussure air max 90 pas cher, the suspects Shen Xiaoyong has been claiming to have been wronged, "If I do, how contractors have served!"
According to Chinese law, "the amount involved is especially huge or other especially serious circumstances, term imprisonment or life imprisonment." From judicial interpretation, the "huge" means "more than 20 million property fraud."
Yesterday's court prosecution and the defense is intense, even the trial judge also came to attend the first trial. Suspects and their lawyers that the case is being framed, and the prosecution believes that criminal facts are clear.
In this scam from the strange, because of the lack of evidence to support this chain, the truth confusing. Court did not in court ruling, the fate of a middle-aged man, before the final judgment is still suspense.