he can see with

JK9YT4j410

"Almost five years, and from my father-in Sanhe, Hebei 130 times, looking for flats, looking for the court, light travel spent over twenty-five thousand yuan, but did not get back a penny,http://www.facetwitter.pw/?module=FG7RT5h63, the family and therefore owe a lot of debt now He on the age,hollister outlet, poor health,http://www.emr4u.net/index.php?option=com_blog&view=blog,piumini moncler, run, and it is our turn to run. But it went one day it stop? "A few days ago, talking about the father Li Shugui encounter, Xiao Wu angry about.
"Finally win the lawsuit, but got the judgment can not be executed. This is not equal to the white judge it?" Xiao Wu said he was puzzled.
Prior to retirement, the unit is removed
1958, Li Shugui to work in Beijing 761 Factory. 1960 joined the army in 1965 and later returned to the demobilization of 761 plants. 1987, transferred to the Sanhe City, Hebei Province is located in the CRBC First Highway Engineering Bureau of the Fifth Engineering Company (hereinafter referred to as the "five companies"). Five companies, is Li Shugui final "boss", also defendants in the case.
"Tune almost did not come to work, company leaders said units downturn, let me leave to go home, then go to work and other notifications. A large living all day, did not live dry, empty heart. I can not remember how many times to find a company asking to come back to work, but each time the answer is 'wait'. "
In the "wait", the time came in July 2002, Li Shugui 60 years of age. "Ten years did not work, verses and uncomfortable than 10 years, the unit has never paid a salary. Units have difficulties, I understand, had admitted. To work for decades, now to the retirement age, to think to do a retirement procedures, with pensions, more or less, in his later years there is always a guarantee. "
However, when  came to the unit retires, he was told: Unit was in January 2002 he was removed from the.
"Why delisting ah? Nobody ever told me this thing to you?" Li Shugui suddenly Mongolia,jordan pas cher.
Judgment "Restore treatment of workers."
And the unit did not talk through; apply for labor arbitration, the losing. A lawsuit is the only way in front of .
"I told the court that on two requirements:? Fill these annual salary, retirement procedures we are not vexatious, otherwise, the unit not to work more than ten years, not earlier Skywarp the"  said.
Course of the trial, the defendant made the five companies,  been removed from the company, because he was no reason to leave. After being removed, the two sides have been non-existent labor relations, to request payment of wages since 1987, no basis in fact; he is no longer their employees, of course, will not apply for retirement procedures.
Li Shugui and five companies have not signed a formal labor contract, but he was the company's employees, the parties have no objection. Accordingly the court held that: "both the original defendant has labor relations, the defendant claims delisting decision has been made due to delisting of five companies before deciding on the plaintiff, the plaintiff has not been back to the unit written notice to the plaintiff and the plaintiff removed when five companies, not to Written in the form of a written decision will be sent to the plaintiff removed, so that the five companies delisting of the plaintiff does not hold. "
November 2004,hogan, Sanhe City, Hebei Province,tn pas cher, the court ruling: "Restoring the plaintiff Li Shugui defendant CRBC First Highway Engineering Bureau of the fifth treatment engineering company employees."
"That day is November 24th. This day,peuterey outlet, I shall never forget." From that day on, smile, back to Li Shugui face.
"Performing the subject is not clear," can not be executed
After Sanhe City Court verdict,http://www.knownicing.com/forum/profile.php?id=2733,  and five companies were not parties to appeal within the statutory period, the decision takes effect.
"Since the court sentenced, according to the execution of the judgment on the line." Li Shugui and family is very optimistic. But the fact that they optimistic too soon.
Five companies do not perform "Restore treatment of workers," the verdict. Reporter contacted five companies, like to hear their views on the decision, and why not the judgment. Office comrade said, "and then asked the leadership to respond," the reporter to leave the phone. Wait a few days, no response, so reporters office phone rang again and was told "to find Qiaoke Zhang (sound) to understand the situation," and told reporters that the extension number. Reporters repeatedly call, or no answer,mulberry sale, or "Qiaoke Chang" out of office, the reporter had to leave their contact details to tell his colleagues, "Qiao Kezhang" call back at your convenience. But until this writing, has not been responded to.
The company does not perform, then find the court. 2005, Li Shugui to Sanhe City court for enforcement. "In recent years,nike air max pas cher, I went to Three Rivers ran more than 130 times, the judge did not perform less call reminders to the company, but has been no progress."
February 2009, Sanhe City Court (2005) made a civil ruling (c Zhi Zi No. 1002), determined that "the implementation of the underlying judgment dispositif is not clear", whereby the court rejected the application for enforcement. Implementation, screeching halt.
How to understand "the implementation of the underlying judgment dispositif is not clear?" Party in 2005 made an application to enforce, why four years after dismissal ruling made? For the above-mentioned problems,woolrich outlet, the reporter to verify the implementation of the Chamber of Sanhe City Court and was told to go through the interview hospital spokesman. Spokesman leaving phone calls from reporters,http://bbs.techcommsalon.com/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=1390160, after no more is heard. Before press time, the reporter repeatedly call a spokesman for the office phone, has no answer.
Five years later, the end back to the beginning
Although the ruling dismissed the execution,http://moodle.ndna.org.uk/login/index.php?item/create_form/1,nike tn, Sanhe City, the court did not refer the case a push. "To be the conscience, Sanhe City courts to enforce court judge did little to worry about for this case." After the 2009 Chinese New Year, 's son Xiao Wu to Three Rivers ran a lot of times, again and again and court communication. He said that the judge's efforts, he can see with, and the gratitude in my heart.
First recommendation back to the labor arbitration judges to apply the subject of arbitration execute clear, settled amount, the court can perform. March 26,  submitted to arbitration application to the Sanhe City labor dispute arbitration committee. April 17,air max pas cher, labor dispute arbitration committee inadmissible cases the notice on the grounds that "the application limitation has expired."
The road did not go through arbitration, the judge let Li Shugui to re-write the civil complaint, the lawsuit write clear, beating a lawsuit. Reporters saw, in this civil complaint,http://bbs.yxdvr.com/bbs/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=457621&fromuid=40375, Li Shugui to five company made seven claims: pay the pension insurance, apply for retirement; replacement cost of living; reissue business subsidies; children succession; old age pension replacement; reimbursement five years more than 130 times the cost of round-trip Sanhe; reissue holiday costs, heating costs.
May 4, Xiao Wu telephone call to reporters,http://www.qqyaoqing.com/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=3838,moncler sito ufficiale, said the Sanhe City Court informed them accept their prosecution has been filed and will be hearing May 15. "This time really solve the problem?" Xiao Wu tone,http://www.prawdadlapuszczy.pl/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=652218, full of hope and full of anxiety.
For the present case, this newspaper will continue to focus on.
?Exclusive articles Sina statement: This work (text, pictures, graphics and audio and video) for Sina to use, without authorization, any media, and individuals may not be reproduced in whole or in part.