413H7QV301

seHG99xywg

Hui Zeng Wen _ the correspondents from Beijing
In Fang looked positive for transgenic "science" when an unexpected person - cui stand up and detonated the war. Since "Fang Yuan" pinch frame, from transgenic to foundations, from the network to the court, the two sides exchanged fire efforts at all levels. This time, he was not to challenge others, but opponents want Sike.
"Cui To ruin my reputation."
? Against Hope: You sue Cui, claims 300,000 yuan. From the announcement to put into practice, the process is very fast.
Fang: I said, then it certainly would be honored, not to mention after I declared him but intensified. 300,000 yuan not on wild speculations, which can be considered defamation lawsuit general price tag, (claim) will not support the high court, the punishment is too low will not achieve his role. I do not agree with the so-called "one-dollar lawsuit," it does not make sense. The evidence is obvious, as long as the court a fair trial, I have no problem winning.
? Against Hope: You accuse cui rumors,piumino moncler, slander, but you also said that when the online response to some "outrageous", then how can it be considered?
Fang: rumors, slander is not a sentence or two thing, he called me from start to finish in the "elbow", "disgusting liar", "cult leaders", "Hitler" and so on, as long as some people say bad things about me on the Internet He will be forwarded. Have claimed that I spent $ 680,000 to buy a house in the United States, he would be forwarded to say "the money is lying to." This is not the usual ridicule and satire, his subjective intention is very obvious, just want to discredit me, ruin my reputation.
I also had to fight back, but but are factual, but also he is a first-name, there has been no personal attacks. I'm just the right sense of proportion in this, it's not in order to avoid legal risks, but that is not necessary.
? Against Hope: There withdrawal possible?
Fang: If his apology,moncler outlet online, and are willing to pay the spirit of compensation, of course I can not litigate. But he has let it be said that we must press down on me, I can only fight in the end.
Against Hope:? Now about "Fang Yuan war of words," the topic is beyond the scope of the transgene. This will allow people to lose instead of transgenic problem itself attention?
Fang: I think the outside world, "war of words" was biased. The whole thing is cui provoked, he knows the problems of the transgene is overconfident fight with me, they begin to discredit me. Throughout all he called me one, I'll give him back a block from no active provocation.
This topic between me and he may have been marginalized, but it does not mean that the debate on GM will stop here, there are still many people in academic circles for its "name." Even if me and his lawsuit, I am afraid (transgenic) will fight it.
? Against Hope: Why are you quite genetically?
Fang: 1996 Americans began to cultivate genetically modified, when I was in the United States, it has come into contact with, know that it is safe, can be promoted. Biologists agree with the mainstream view is that it is, the majority of the scientific community who is also "quite turn". Of course, there are very few people who engage in physical "reverse", but they do not understand biology.
? Against Hope: But in this debate, Cui play is an investigative role, but you have been standing in the position of preaching. Some people say "no investigation, no right to speak", how do you see?
Fang: cui to the United States to do the investigation, known as spent 500,000, but that is totally funny. He thought go to the supermarket and see, go and ask the farmer to do to understand the genetically modified? He himself does not know English,http://safemarketlink.com/Requests/profile.php?id=39213, holding a bag of stuff written GMO-free, but does not know, he said "at this supermarket to see things that are not marked if they contain genetically modified ingredients." When to cui assistant, is pushing the "water change oil" Chen Yiwen, deliberately does not necessarily translate to blind him.
I certainly have the investigation. Transgenic final analysis of biological knowledge, I understand how it works. I was online access to the documents of the US State Department, found that they did in large-scale cultivation and consumption of genetically modified products.
? Against Hope: You used to say, "not the person," do not look at the matter of how you evaluate cui?
Fang: I often deal with him much. In the past he did "tell the truth", the invitation I went to two shows, which aired one another of being nipped off. Another time, there is a site to do a survey, 90% supported me, Cui turn on the microblogging this result, and said, "I'm the one." At that time I told him a good impression,jordan pas cher, that he was a man of truth, dare to sound science.
But then I realized that maybe just his appearance. Cui really do not understand science, but also to defend unscrupulous error. Now he has gone to the extreme, even quit work, single-minded to deal with me.
I'm not interested in how high Han
? Against Hope: You seem to have a selective anti-counterfeiting, based on what you choose when you consider?
Fang: I do not have anti-counterfeiting team, I have always been a person, so it does not so much energy to take into account all aspects of the matter. I take the initiative to play, in general,piumini moncler, have certain academic content, others can not fight. Another one, I try to pick out some influence relatively large, misguided and may cause more serious harm to public figures. Such as playing academic fraud, I'll focus on some academicians, well-known professors, teachers and students on general I do not want to control.
Also, I do not quite like to join in the fun, like the Red Cross,piumino moncler, cooking oil this topic, long ago, there are many professionals to intervene, and things very clear, I will not have to come forward.
? Against Hope: Who can appear to be normalizing who you play, is to hype yourself?
Fang: I actually was fake people, many just happened to hit the muzzle it. Such as Han, when he declared war Catcher forward, initially I did not care, then there are a lot of people! I am only concerned about this, put his work pulls out of view again. Whether or not I take the initiative to fight, as long as this person is really a problem, I will expose.
For example, Jimmy Lin, also friends told me that he was the endorsement of a product, let me see. I see, is not that just played before the collagen it? So for him, of course,http://phpwind.hkcnidc.com/read.php?tid=5592462&ds=1, will not let go.
I know some people say I fake to the hype. Why can no one to emulate it? This is not a good way to see the famous. To be honest, counterfeiting really let me have fame, but also makes me play more clout. The same problem, others play and I play, really quite different.
Caltech Albert in "Threads" on the question Tang Jun, no one concern. Very occasionally the day, I saw someone asked Tang qualifications on the microblogging, because I edited Albert article, you unhesitatingly back to the sentence "diploma is false", the results lead to a big stir, even myself have not thought of.
? Against Hope: not map name, is a profit it?
Fang: I have a man-made rumor, saying that I was an American transgenic corporate spokesperson. I "quite turn", Americans should hate my son. Because I am quite the China Agricultural Universities independently developed two transgenic varieties, is to come up to talk to their competition. I did not gain the benefits of a penny, if you insist little economic benefit, at most,louboutin pas cher, I wrote some of the book describes the resulting transgenic Royalty.
I know cui in to get my "Security Fund" that matter. In this Xu Yu Zhen 3,000,000 before I donate a total of more than 100 million were spent on these years of my personal security. The money at the time to set up, we will have a statement, and not made public using details. Overheating That Take this thing to attack me, then he invited Beijing's rent, Economic Investigation, vigorously engage in a fan survey, not found any problems. I played so many years of false, all his public behavior.
? Against Hope: You have to Han's height inquisitive, but also for the public interest?
Fang: It was just policy, I told him I did not in the end how high interest. The reason why throw this question in order to prove something so obvious he did not dare to face the correct description of the man lying by nature.
? Against Hope: You have played false in various fields. Do you think with your own knowledge, able to support such a broad question it?
Fang: This is really a contradiction. I questioned a little, and someone said I was selective; questioned more, and that I was in charge too wide. In general,http://e-learning.tsu.ge/login/index.php?item/create_form/1, very cautious when I fake,http://learningnetwork.childrensfoodtrust.org.uk/login/index.php?item/create_form/1, like something scientific, I have basic literacy, but do not know or will ask a friend to be more professional, sometimes enthusiastic users to help provide clues, I will carefully verify.
Not all industries are required expertise to false identification. Like you said on plagiarism and academic literature, I put two articles were compared and found to repeat the entire segment,http://www.jc8881890.com/bbs/read.php?tid=229036&ds=1, which at a glance.
"I put a lichengpeng a horse."
? Against Hope: Controversy over with so many people,moncler uomo, who do you think you can be called a real opponent?
Fang: say "opponent", then, strictly speaking, they are wrong, no way to destabilize me. But some people can see the situation, like Kai-fu Lee, Xianshibumiao hastened to apologize, I will no longer be prosecuted. Lichengpeng also apologized, although the lack of sincerity, but I still put him on a horse, he is very clever.
? Against Hope: you will not go wrong when? Been questioned by others feel better taste it?
Fang: I certainly made some small mistakes when writing an article, or the fact that there have been some clerical error, but without malice, be flaws it found that even after very quickly corrected.
The biggest mistake is to confuse the fake objects - two people of the same name, and the same grade at the same university. Fortunately, one hour later, I discovered the problem, immediately delete the micro-Bo, also issued a statement of apology. Overall,moncler milano, those who question me,http://zaplike.com/fghtryfg3l/blog/714060/, can not find what mishap.
Against Hope:? There are fewer and fewer people have not found support for you?
Fang: I do not think fewer supporters, but the enemy did more and more,http://www.365kl.net/home.php?mod=spacecp&ac=blog&blogid=, because you hit a person, actually offended gang. Of course, there is some loss, we call that "in front of pink," these people are now posting scolded me all day, became the most authentic "black party." In fact, they support me when originally mixed with personal purposes, or to my knowledge is very superficial. People who really understand the science will not leave me.
? Against Hope: You are Dr. biology, why the crackdown as a career, rather than engage in academic,http://social1.net46.net/user/fgy56uyra1/blogs, do research?
Fang: I do is science, writing articles, do site is just one part of the crackdown. I think the Chinese do science more sense than to engage in scientific research, if I really engage in research, may be just an ordinary researchers, this country does not lack talent. Science not only to popularize scientific knowledge, but it is important to spread the spirit of science and the scientific method.
I was a no units, who are not implicated, can independently do these things, I do not expect people to like me.
? Against Hope: So you think the Chinese community lacks scientific spirit,moncler outlet?
Fang: In China, about the weak scientific environment. Our emphasis is on traditional culture of moderation, not seriously, this is the spirit of science natural opposition. Two years ago, China Science and Technology Association of the data that only 3% of people with a scientific literacy level of 20 years ago in the West, I think this data may have been posted gold.
Talking about science, we must first speak up. I worked with Professor Crick, his professionalism,abercrombie soldes, let me admire. Chinese scientists like rare, has died Zou Chenglu should count as one.
He is known as the "fake fighter" Pente shelling, endless. He Battle over legal circles He Weifang, literary Han, Zhong Nanshan Overheating, the business community, the medical profession ...... Recently, he and Cui wrangling. He is Fang. In his report to the court on the day, the ICAC? Hope reporters in Beijing conducted an exclusive interview with him.
[Interview Notes] from Fang into the leasing office, to which he appeared in ten minutes, the reporters have been thinking, how with this "old world" in his opening remarks. According to media in the past rendered appearance point of view, my interview subject is an emotionally intense person, Cheng Yong aggressive.
Outside suddenly came rapid footsteps. A face with a tired, tall and thin men just a door,outlet moncler, he held out his hand to say hello. A closer look, it is not exactly Fang?
Taking advantage of warming awkward pleasantries, the reporter straight into the subject. We talked about the "Fang Yuan Wars", "fake fighter" talk from transgenic to cognitive science, I have been careful to "beware" of swerved his look, but he did not enraptured from beginning to end, nor generous remarks,moncler outlet online, but politely patiently talking about all topics.
Reporters tried to give him a "prick" and asked him fake motivation, and asked who he was talking mood. Surprisingly, in the face of these tricky issues, he does not shy away, unhurried to answer.
Reporters feel that I faced this Fang very normal, not aggressive, not crazy, but he recognized for their own there is a persistent, or stubborn.
About crackdown, maybe he does have some reason my heart is still hidden, perhaps his judgment is not entirely right place. But in the community, "false" too much, too few people dare to speak bluntly, his maverick is even more commendable. Fang's also because there are a pair of eyes, a public figure was more discipline, more "careful."
Fang crackdown, love grabbing hold question naturally will offend many people. But our opinion, Yung had so many "false", do not tolerate a truth-seeking people?