o2A7HOzSwX

过户如同后天

??
□ edition the author information Times reporter Yan Xiaoguang Li Zhaotao
Longmou doing business in Guangzhou, Dongguan, the court is due to issue blank check bills fraud sentenced to five years. After an appeal, retrial and other procedures, prosecutors ultimately made the decision not to prosecute. 478 days in custody because, Longmou Dongguan Municipal Public Security Bureau to apply for state compensation 720 000, Guangdong Provincial High Court yesterday held a hearing for the case. At the hearing, saying all Longmou Guangdong A ××× 48 cars were Dongguan Municipal Public Security Bureau illegally detained 300 days, unauthorized use of the vehicle was seized during the further people, occurred three traffic violations penalties,http://www.enochnj.org/pagegen.cgi,woolrich outlet, fines totaling 668 yuan . But Dongguan Municipal Public Security Bureau denied.
Empty promises sentenced to fraud
Longmou boss mall in Guangzhou, a plate, the event is why the sky? Guangzhou businessman jailed in Dongguan Longmou Why would it? According to the verdict shows, December 8, 2005, Longmou came Houjie Town of Dongguan City, the Department of Industrial timber market a business, buy a batch of about 18 million worth of timber. Subsequently, Longmou with two denominations were 90,000 yuan and 90,800 yuan a check delivered the money. A few days later, operators that lack of checks by bank balances Longmou issued, Ryu victims unit staff will call and tell the Longmou situation. Longmou verbal commitment a few days on payment, but has not fulfill its commitments. Moreover phone went dead, victims unit there is no way to contact Longmou. See paragraph unfunded chase,http://www.kyoto-oasc.jp, victims unit January 18, 2006 report to the public security organs. Longmou after that, commissioned by his nephew on January 19, 2006 paid 10,000 yuan to victims unit, police officers on September 7, 2006 at Gongbei will be ready to exit Longmou arrested, November 2006 the 29th Longmou pay the remaining money. The court found he used bad checks to cheat other people's property, a huge amount, thus constituting bills fraud.
Misjudge awarded 47,400
Longmou After being arrested, do not think of themselves as a crime: "First, I never thought about going to get money, then I do not care about the strength of this money; second, final payment arrears are also reimbursed,tn requin pas cher, at best can be regarded as a civil dispute, how would involve sin? "So, he appealed to the Dongguan City Intermediate People's Court, September 26,http://www.goo-net.com/cgi-bin/goojp/bbs/thread_list.cgi, 2007, Dongguan City Court upheld the ruling, cassation remand. During the proceedings, Dongguan City People's Procuratorate in urban December 26, 2007 made a decision not to prosecute book. A few days later, Longmou acquitted.
However, 478 days in custody experience so Longmou can never forget. "From the moment jail, my life path to a 180-degree turn," said Longmou from the judgment is given, he returned to his hometown will be treated as criminals, and his two stalls also face closure .
Longmou believes that public security three must take responsibility. June 23,nike tn, 2008, he was first and Dongguan City People's Court of Dongguan City People's Procuratorate urban court. Late last year, Dongguan Intermediate People's Court on Longmou of a "Compensation Commission decision" confirmed Longmou was wrong catch misjudged, violation of personal liberty 478 days of illegal facts, the decision by the Dongguan City People's Court and the city of Dongguan City People's Procuratorate, common compensation Longmou was wrong in custody 478 days of liberty compensation 47,400 yuan.
Sued the Public Security claims 720,000
Longmou Dongguan Public Security Bureau also proposes to apply for state compensation, yesterday afternoon,hogan donna, the case held a hearing on the state compensation cases in Guangdong People's Court, reporters throughout Central. Longmou claims illegal seizure of vehicles 300 days of economic loss caused by the illegal detention of two sheet metal shop during the closure of the necessary operating expenses and attorney costs and other economic losses totaling 72 million yuan.
Yesterday afternoon, the judge asked the basis for the claims related to the project, the announced end of the hearing, the parties do not agree to mediation. It is reported that the application for state compensation Longmou can be supported, you need to be decided by the Guangdong High Court Compensation Commission after discussion.
Strange floating voir
In court, Longmou also exposed a Xiqiao Shi. Allegedly,basket tn pas cher, January 18,nike tn requin pas cher, 2006, Dongguan Municipal Public Security Bureau of Interpol team on his car impounded Guangdong A ××× 48, but the strange thing is that during the seizure, but he received three violation records, respectively, in 2006 1 January 18, January 31, 2006 and March 24, 2006. His family was afraid because uninformed overdue payment will receive fines, on August 17,requin tn pas cher, 2007 by China Post to deliver a traffic offense agent center three pen fine.
He believes that the staff of Dongguan Municipal Public Security Bureau seized goods in violation of relevant regulations, unauthorized use of a vehicle was seized. More outrageous is actually in violation of traffic rules during unauthorized use,http://www.k-macs.ne.jp/~anb/cgi-bin/nicky.cgi, causing the car received three tickets, fines totaling 668 yuan. It claims 720,000 yuan of which contains a fine of 668 yuan. Longmou said: "During the seizure also be able to hit the road with only one reasonable interpretation, it is the staff of Dongguan Municipal Public Security Bureau detained the driver of the vehicle was used, and the violation resulted in fines."
However, the Dongguan Municipal Public Security Bureau denied the use of the vehicle led to the fact that during the seizure and violation fines, said two of which occurred in 2005 is illegal, not during a seizure, while another violation occurs in the seizure of the day, do not agree to give the State Compensation .
Violation records "hide and seek"?
Mr. Long: "reasonable interpretation can also be driven on the road during the seizure of only one, that is, the staff of Dongguan Municipal Public Security Bureau detained the driver of the vehicle was used, and the resulting violation fines."
Dongguan Municipal Public Security Bureau: "According to the evidence we retrieved Vehicle Administration Department show that Mr. Long's vehicle violation records Only in January 31, 2005 and March 24, 2005,http://fskfp.joinbbs.net/viewthread.php?tid=167937&extra=,moncler outlet sito ufficiale, Mr. Long was not alleged in 2006. "
Mr. Long: "Now this is the result of the other cheating violation records, because this record is contrary to common sense and vehicle regulations, in accordance with the provisions of vehicle management,woolrich outlet, vehicle violation fines are not paid, the year can not be examined and my car. but just passed the 2005 annual review, the results of this contradiction proves vehicle violation record date now is the result of man-made cheating. "
Dongguan Municipal Public Security Bureau: "According to relevant regulations, the new car has just purchased a two-year trial, Mr. Long's vehicle was registered March 11, 2004, so before August 1, 2006 do not need to examined, so the dragon President said the 2005 annual review does not comply with the law. "
Mr. Long: "I have two postal remittance receipts, shown above, is" illegal Date January 31, 2006 "and" March 24, 2006, "and the record of these two instruments receipt number and the public security organs instrument number and obtain exactly the same, showing that the same single fine, why there will be two dates it?
Dongguan Municipal Public Security Bureau: Mr. Long is just the proof postal remittance receipts, but the law is merely the date printed on the "postscript", which as we usually require an invoice books invoicing vendors fill the same, there are certain randomness, recorded in the "postscript" in the not legally binding.
The first single reported case of an injustice to sit for 1 year in prison
September 7, 2006, Dongguan Municipal Public Security Bureau Houjie alleged fraud in issuing bad checks bills for his criminal detention; month on the 21st, Longmou were arrested.
March 8, 2007, Dongguan City People's Court sentenced him bills fraud five years imprisonment. Longmou then appeal, the same year on September 26, Dongguan City Court upheld the ruling, cassation remand. In the same year on December 26,http://www.doi.org/cgi-bin/search.cgi, Dongguan City People's Procuratorate made urban written decision not to prosecute,hogan outlet, on the 28th, Longmou acquitted.
By the end of 2008,nike air jordan pas cher, Dongguan Intermediate People's Court of Dongguan City People's Court and the decision of Dongguan City People's Procuratorate compensation urban Longmou liberty compensation 47,400 yuan.
March 11,outlet moncler online, 2009,http://www.wannyann.com/cgi-bin/glight/glight.cgi, the Guangdong Provincial People's Court held a Longmou Dongguan Public Security Bureau to apply for state compensation hearings.
Voir two divisions of private cars is "public"
January 18, 2006, Dongguan City, Guangdong Public Security Bureau detained A4D848 car.
January 18, 2006, January 31, March 24, this appeared to be impounded vehicle Longmou were three traffic violation ticket.
November 16, 2006, Dongguan City, Guangdong Public Security Bureau reimbursement A4D848 car.
August 17, 2007, China Post delivery Longmou family through these three fine pens traffic offense charge d'affaires to the center,http://sportsfan.jpn.org/cgi-kban/sunbbs.cgi?mode=form&no=66&page=2, plus fees, the amount on the receipt of remittances three were 189.10 yuan, 239.45 yuan, 239.45 yuan.