and ultimately the court rejected his claim.

hjkjkljj4x9y

According to market Star newspaper reported, to promote feelings,http://bbs.sddp.net/home.php?mod=space&uid=116281,boutique louboutin paris, her husband will house a gift to his wife,http://www.6zft.com/home.php?mod=space&uid=54468, who knows, not long, but the prosecution to divorce his wife. Subsequently, the husband sued to court to set aside the public certificate signed by both parties. Yesterday, reporters learned, including the River District Court recently decided a case like this together.
Sun (a pseudonym) and his wife,peuterey, Ms. Ding (a pseudonym) purchased a Sun marriage points welfare housing units. In the Sun seems, the two married feeling is still good,http://bbs.mtxgx.com/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=19668,woolrich outlet, but the house in whose name does not affect their lives,http://www.ynfzxxw.com/bbs/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=39085, but will help improve marital relations. So,hollister, September 3, 2012, the two signed an "Agreement", agreed to put this house DING free gift, not as a jointly owned property.
The same day, two men in Hefei, a notary office of the notary procedures. Can make Sun did not expect that,http://www.520bridge.com/home.php?mod=space&uid=110339&do=blog&quickforward=1&id=26887, when the September 21, DING, after obtaining the property, to the court for divorce. After that, the court allowed the couple divorced. Angry Sun made to sue the court for revocation of deed signed by both parties.
Court after hearing the view that the two men agreed to form notarized both houses will be common to all convention DING personal property,hogan outlet,http://www.itcai.net/home.php?mod=space&uid=72258, in line with relevant laws and regulations. Sun did not provide evidence that the notary DING property ownership during its existence and its deception and the two sides after the property notarization,http://bbs.trszs.com/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=18265, DING sued for divorce Department of exercising their rights of freedom of divorce,http://50.87.130.157/~xiaocoun/thread-1887221-1-1.html, the prosecution did not act against the interests of their families. Therefore, Sun does not comply with the requirements of the public certificate revocation of relevant laws and regulations, and ultimately the court rejected his claim. (Cordingley into a thick Mabing Lu Su)
(Original title: House hand, the wife filed for divorce)